International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), India Online ISSN: 2319-7064
Volume 2 Issue 2, February 2013
www.ijsr.net
use and implication of Poka Yoke technique in Service
sector. Comparing with other sectors, although the service
sector has been growing fast and shares most of the revenue
and employment worldwide; apparently its productivity and
quality have not been growing. What is vital in today’s
growing of the service sector is to have a better
understanding of tools, techniques, and policies to help keep
management’s focus on productivity and quality
improvement. The rigorous application to the service sector
of those engineering and management techniques that have
been so effective in the manufacturing sector is a starting
point for service managers to help them bring their
companies back to life. In this paper, Poka yoke as one of
the effective quality design techniques experienced in
manufacturing has been suggested and developed for service
fail-safing. For this purpose, the subjects of service failure
and service recovery have been introduced. Then, service
Poka yoke has been demonstrated and its solutions have
been classified. Some case examples have been presented in
three categories as layout, technology and self-service for a
better understanding of the subject. This paper also has
proposed a framework, by which the common and
uncommon elements of service Poka yoke and Service
recovery solutions have been classified and addressed
schematically. The framework seems very helpful for the
managers to focus on the more effective approaches, if they
are about to fix problems at the design stage of the
processes. Finally, some barriers and critical success factors
of adopting Poka yoke in services applications has been
discussed.
Ramin Sadri, Pouya Taheri, Pejman Azarsa and Hedayat
Ghavam have carried out research to improve the
productivity through Mistake-proofing of Construction
Processes. Construction defects are always the key concern
of the construction industry. Different constructed facilities
generate different types of defects and demand different
levels and types of quality, depending on the functions,
system types, and materials used.
To achieve mistake-proofing concept in a construction site,
zones where are prone to error should be identified. These
mistakes could be quality problems, delay in delivering a
mid-process product, safety issues and so on. By tracking
where the problems locate, the project manager could place
his/her attention on investigating and resolving the problem,
and implement the mistake-proofing device to prevent
recurrence of problems in the future. There are six of main
mistake-proofing principles listed in order of preference in
fundamentally addressing mistakes: (1) Elimination seeks to
eliminate the possibility of error by redesigning the product
or process so that the task or part is no longer necessary; (2)
Replacement substitutes a more reliable process to improve
consistency; (3) Prevention engineers the product or
processes so it is impossible to make a mistake at all; (4)
Facilitation employs techniques and combining steps to
make work easier to perform; (5) Detection involves
identifying an error before further processing occurs so that
the user can quickly correct the problem; (6) Mitigation
seeks to minimize the effect of errors. The results show that
the construction operations have high potential of mistake-
proofing, and therefore the application of Poka-yoke devices
can finally lead to drastic promotion in construction industry.
At last section, a case study related to the simple operation of
a trolley hoist also conducted to evaluate productivity
improvement due to the process mistake proofing in practice
4. Poke Yoke
Poka-yoke is a Japanese term that means "fail-safing" or
"mistake-proofing". A poka-yoke is any mechanism in a lean
manufacturing process that helps an equipment operator
avoid (yokeru) mistakes (poka). Its purpose is to eliminate
product defects by preventing, correcting, or drawing
attention to human errors as they occur. The concept was
formalised, and the term adopted, by Shigeo Shingo as part
of the Toyota Production System. It was originally described
as baka-yoke, but as this means "fool-proofing" (or "idiot-
proofing") the name was changed to the milder poka-yoke.
Figure 2: Simple Example of Poka Yoke
Shigeo Shingo recognized three types of poka-yoke for
detecting and preventing errors in a mass production system.
The contact method identifies product defects by testing the
product's shape, size, color, or other physical attributes. The
fixed-value (or constant number) method alerts the operator
if a certain number of movements are not made. The motion-
step (or sequence) method determines whether the prescribed
steps of the process have been followed.
Either the operator is alerted when a mistake is about to be
made, or the poka-yoke device actually prevents the mistake
from being made. In Shingo's lexicon, the former
implementation would be called a warning poka-yoke, while
the latter would be referred to as a control poka-yoke. Shingo
argued that errors are inevitable in any manufacturing
process, but that if appropriate poka-yokes are implemented,
then mistakes can be caught quickly and prevented from
resulting in defects. By eliminating defects at the source, the
cost of mistakes within a company is reduced.
Technical aspect of Poka-Yoke method
Poka-Yoke technique can be applied both to prevent causes,
which will result in subsequent occurrences of errors and to
carry out inexpensive control determining whether to adopt
or reject the product. It is not always 100% probability
elimination of all errors, in such cases it is the task of Poka-
Yoke methods is detection as soon as possible. Analyze the
process of product defects formation noted that between a
mistakes resulting from the defect is yet one, the potential