Youth. Women. Entrepreneurship. | Appendix
21
Main Outcomes of IOE-BUSINESS AT
OECD Survey on Implementation of
G20 Commitments
As joint representatives of the global
business community, the International
Organization of Employers (IOE) and
Business at OECD have been actively
engaged in the employment and social
policy aspects of the G20/B20 process
since its inception.
Obtaining better implementation of G20
commitments has been a continued
priority for the IOE and Business at OECD.
Together they have monitored the national
follow-up to the 2013 and 2015 G20 Labor
Ministerial Declaration as well as the
implementation of the 2013 B20-L20 Joint
Understanding on Key Elements of Quality
Apprenticeships.
The G20 Labor Ministers’ meetings in
Melbourne (2014), in Ankara (2015) and
more recently in Beijing (2016) resulted
in Labor Ministers making concrete
commitments with regard to employment
generally, youth, education, gender,
OSH and other policies. Moreover, G20
governments up-dated their National
Employment Plans in spring 2016.
To increase accountability, the IOE and
Business at OECD have done a survey of
Employers Organizations in G20 countries
to monitor the implementation of these
commitments as well as the accuracy
of national G20 employment plans. In
particular, this year’s monitoring focuses
specically on two targets on “reducing
the gap in participation rates between
men and women in G20 countries by
25 percent by 2025, taking into account
national circumstances” and “reduce the
share of young people who are most at
risk of being permanently left behind in the
labor market by 15 percent by 2025 in G20
counties, enhancing youth employment
capacity”. This fact sheet summarizes a
number of interim ndings:
A majority of the responses to the
survey acknowledge some degree of
implementation of the G20 commitments
at the national level. The survey responses
indicate that many governments have
shown to have followed up on the
Melbourne, Ankara and Hangzhou G20
Labor Ministers’ Declaration and have
developed initiatives to implement the
commitments at the national level. This is
very encouraging.
However, the picture is far from being
perfect. While there have been attempts
to implement the G20 commitments at
the national level, often the implemented
policies do not seem to meet the intended
targets, especially when it comes to
important areas of the labor market such
as the reduction of non-wage labor costs.
A majority of responses show that labor
costs have instead increased, leading to
worsened labor conditions in many of the
G20 countries. Reduced non-wage labor
costs are a key factor to make employment
aordable. Thus, G20 governments should
be mindful in living up to their commitment
in this regard.
Responses have been mixed when
considering the improvement of public
employment and administration
services. Half of the responses show that
initiatives have been taken to improve the
eectiveness of these services, while the
other half of the responses show that no
initiatives have been taken at all. More push
is needed to encourage the G20 countries
to follow through their commitments in this
area.
On reducing the gender gap in wages and
in participation rates, an overwhelming
majority of G20 countries have recognized
eorts being made. However, half of
the G20 countries indicated that such
eorts have not yielded much positive
results. One reason for the lack of positive
responses has been the time lag between
the implementation of initiatives and the
resulting responses. Initiatives such as
improving access to education for women
and introducing diverse work forms in
the labor market requires time to be set
up, so as to attract more females to enter
the labor market. Indeed, such initiatives
also require individuals to change their
mindsets regarding the role of women in
the workforce. The key message here is to
ensure that eorts are not one-time-only,
but are sustained for a substantial period
of time in order for the policies to take
eect.
Responses have been very positive on
improving the quality of apprenticeships.
A majority of responses revealed that
initiatives to improve the quality of
apprenticeships have been undertaken
with the full engagement of social partners,
while a minority showed that no initiatives
were undertaken at all. The B20/L20’s joint
understanding on key elements of quality
apprenticeships have served as a good
foundation for most of the G20 countries
that have implemented some initiatives
in raising the quality of apprenticeships in
these countries. Notably, the establishment
of GAN National Networks in many of these
countries have been instrumental in this
regard.
On improving youth employment
outcomes, results remain overwhelmingly
positive regarding implementation and
less optimistic regarding the quality of the
Appendix