Verizon has teams that carefully review each demand we receive. We do not produce information in
response to all demands we receive. During the first half of 2023, we did not release records in response
to approximately 10% of all demands we received. Specifically, we did not release records in response to
approximately 9% of the subpoenas we received and approximately 11% of the warrants and orders we
received. We may decline to release records for a number of reasons. In some instances, including
situations when a different type of legal process is needed for the type of information requested, the legal
demand is invalid and therefore rejected. Often, we receive valid demands seeking information about a
phone number serviced by a different provider, meaning that we have no records to produce. Likewise, we
regularly receive demands seeking data that we do not possess. This includes situations where we do not
collect the type of data that law enforcement seeks or where the requested data is beyond our retention
periods.
We also received National Security Letters (NSLs) and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)
Orders, which we address in a separate table at the end of this Transparency Report.
Civil Demands
Although this Transparency Report focuses on the demands we receive from law enforcement, we also
receive discovery requests for data in civil cases. Our team carefully reviews each civil request to ensure
its validity, just as we do in criminal cases. Subpoenas in civil cases are generally issued pursuant to
authorities like Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and similar state rules. Each subpoena
must seek relevant information, and that information must be shared with the other party or parties in the
civil lawsuit.
During the first half of 2023, Verizon received 9,003 subpoenas in civil cases and 29 orders in civil cases.
The 9,003 civil subpoenas sought information about 14,024,498 customer selectors, and the 29 civil
orders sought information about 75 customer selectors. Excluding one very large subpoena, the other
9,002 civil subpoenas sought information about 24,498 customer selectors. The term “customer
selector” refers to an identifier (most often a telephone number) that specifies a given customer.
Demands often seek information about multiple selectors pertaining to the same customer. (For example,
a demand may seek information on multiple phone numbers belonging to the same customer.) For this
reason, the number of selectors listed in this Transparency Report is typically greater than the number of
customer accounts. Approximately 63% of the civil requests we received sought information on only one
selector (and thus only one customer), and about 93% sought information regarding three or fewer
selectors (and thus three or fewer customers). During the first half of 2023, we did not produce any data
in response to 51% of civil discovery requests. Like with criminal demands, some civil requests were
legally invalid or should have been directed toward different providers. However, the most common
reason why we did not produce records in civil cases was that responsive records were no longer
available by the time when we received the request. While law enforcement demands in criminal cases
typically seek relatively recent records, civil requests are often submitted long after the relevant events
have occurred. As we retain customer records only for the duration necessary to meet our business
needs, many civil requests seek records that have already surpassed our record retention periods.