OWNER-OPERATOR TAXI LICENCE RESERVE PRICE INVESTIGATION 2021: FINAL REPORT AND DETERMINATION
TASMANIAN ECONOMIC REGULATOR 13
A competitive market for taxi licences is one where there is a large number of sellers of PTLs
and OOTLs and there are no restrictions in the relevant area that prevent existing operators
and particularly potential operators from purchasing taxi licences. These restrictions might
include lack of access to a radio room or a local monopoly in taxi services. Taxi areas where
there has been a large number of trades of taxi licences, and especially a large number of
OOTLs purchased from the Transport Commission, have been assessed as competitive.
Operators with Wheelchair Accessible Taxis (WATs) compete with operators with other taxi
licences for passengers who do not require a wheelchair. Until recently, it was necessary to
purchase a new vehicle to operate a WAT, at around $70 000. While there has been no cost
for a WAT licence, the vehicle price represented a major cost to begin operations involving
WATs. Furthermore, WATs are generally more costly to run, including higher fuel costs and
maintenance costs. While they can accommodate more passengers, some passengers prefer
to ride in conventional taxis.
Since 30 December 2020, however, Transport Commission may approve a vehicle for use as
a WAT if, at the time of approval, it is not more than seven years old. Taxi operators have
reported that this may reduce the vehicle cost to around $12 000 to $15 000. Some taxi
operator have expressed an interest in operating WATs as a result of this change and two
WAT licences have been issued since 30 December 2020, despite the generally subdued
conditions in the industry.
It is unclear whether, in future years, there will be a substantial increase in the number of
WATs due to the changed requirements. If there are a significant number of additional WATs
in the metropolitan taxi areas, this would likely put downward pressure on taxi licence prices
and lease rates in those areas and potentially in neighbouring taxi areas.
In assessing the level of competition for taxi licences, the Regulator has examined the
purchase of OOTLs from the Transport Commission in the 24 taxi areas since 2008. As noted
above, in 17 taxi areas no OOTLs have been purchased. Generally, outside Hobart, very few
OOTLs have been purchased, with only three purchased in Launceston where a total of 115
perpetual taxi and WAT licences have been issued, and none in Burnie where 22 perpetual
taxi and WAT licences have been issued.
Based on the information made available to the Regulator, the Regulator found that one
factor in explaining the uptake of OOTLs in the different urban taxi areas is access to the
services of an existing radio room with a general phone number such as 131 008 or 132 227.
In the case of Hobart, where there is competition between these radio rooms, new
operators with OOTLs have been accepted as members. In other taxi areas, however, the
members of radio rooms are holders of PTLs only and owners of OOTLs may not accepted as
members or the cost of them becoming members is higher than for holders of PTLs.
In the case of the market for PTLs, in some taxi areas, licence holders may offer for sale a
single licence, or two or three licences. In other taxi areas, especially the areas with relatively
few licences, no licences may be offered for sale over a period of several years or a licence
holder with several licences will offer for sale all licences but not just one or two of those
licences. It was also reported to the Regulator that in one case a licence holder has licences
that are not being used but has specifically stated that they will not be offered for sale to a
rival taxi company in the same taxi area. These cases represent barriers to investors and
operators seeking to enter the industry or expand their operations.
In setting OOTL prices, the Regulator was required to assist in the development of efficient
pricing and competition for taxi licences. In taxi areas where restrictions on competition and
barriers to entry have been identified, the Regulator considered that lower OOTL prices may
provide opportunities for increased competition. The Regulator therefore has determined