Are you part of something greater? Do you have concerns for what happens after your death?
Have you found your priorities are changing as you get older?
Is it too much to ask of doctors to not only acquire technical expertise, but to also understand human needs?
Should there be more courses in medical school?
How did the NewBridge facility better take care of human needs? Is this practical for the long-term residents
whose health may be declining? Is the expense practical? What if there were not community help and
philanthropic contributions?
Do you believe the concept of providing autonomy no matter what the condition is workable? Can we really be
the “authors of the life we live”?
Do you like the concept of Thomas’ Green House? Could you be a member of the staff?
Chapter 6, Letting Go
Gawande speaks of “curbing the medical imperative.” P. 149
“When should we try to fix, and when should we not?”
How would you answer the same question?
In the story of Sarah and Rich Monopoli, Sara underwent excruciating treatment right to the end. What attitudes
and approaches used by this couple do you admire, or agree with, and with which do you disagree?
If you were Sara’s doctors, what would you do differently?
As a family member or close friend, what conversation would you have with them, or should you just “mind
your own business”?
Thinking of people you know, what would the reception be if you were to make “suggestions”?
[There is often a difference between what we say/intend and what is heard by the recipient. Example: We may
suggest the family of a person with cancer look into some treatment we have read about. We mean well, but
what the family may hear you saying is, “You think I’m not doing enough!”]
Often the treatments do not work. Yet our society seems to favor attempts to “fix” the problem. Gawande
quotes statistics that show 25% of Medicare spending goes to the 5% of patients in the last stages of life.
With catastrophic illness, the trend seems to indicate high costs during the onset of the illness, a leveling off of
costs during the mid-stages, and skyrocketing costs during the last stages of life. Yet, the extreme or even
experimental measures do not always improve the quality of life, or even prolong life.
Why do you think it’s so difficult for doctors and/or families to refuse or curtail treatment?
How should priorities be set?
How can we avoid ICUs that turn out to be, as one doctor commented, “a warehouse for the dying”?
What are your priorities? What criteria would you use or have your family use to determine what, if any,
measures or treatments to use?
How do we build a healthcare system that will help end-of-life priorities to be accommodated?
Do you think that advancements in the medical field damage our ability to have a quality end of life?
P. 156, Gawande speaks of “dying customs.” He certainly has those customs in his family.
What dying customs exist in your family? Do you talk about this?