the cancer centre), palliative hospices, continuing facilities
(including regular continuing care facilities, auxiliary hospi-
tals and nursing homes) and at home are summarized in
Table 1. There was a significant shift in location from acute
care facilities to continuing care facilities and home over
that period. Post hoc comparisons showed that, between
1992/93 and 1994/95, there was a small decrease in the
number of deaths in acute care hospitals accompanied by an
increase in deaths at home (p < 0.001, χ
2
analysis).
The number of deaths and lengths of stay in acute care
hospitals and the cancer centre decreased significantly be-
tween 1992/93 and 1996/97 (Table 2). They did not change
over time in the tertiary palliative care unit.
In 1992/93, 22% of cancer patients (290/1341) had con-
sulted a palliative care team, as compared with 84%
(1110/1326) in 1996/97 (p < 0.001). In 1996/97, 372 physicians
consulted the program for joint care of specific patients. Of
these, 287 (77%) were family physicians, representing 35% of
the 816 family physicians registered in the Edmonton region.
A subset of 268 consecutive patients with terminal can-
cer who were discharged from the cancer centre were asked
whether they wanted to remain under the care of their fam-
ily physician or wished to change, or whether they had no
designated family physician. Most (240 [89%]) wanted to
remain under the care of their family physician. The re-
maining 28 expressed a need for a new family physician; in
all cases, an alternative physician was identified within 24
hours from the list of 150 family physicians who were will-
ing to take charge of new patients.
Interpretation
We found a significant shift in deaths from hospital to
palliative hospice and home care settings since the intro-
duction of the Edmonton Regional Palliative Care Pro-
gram as well as a significant decrease in average length of
stay in both acute care facilities and the cancer centre. Al-
though we reported only patients’ last stay in these facilities
before death, it is unlikely that a decrease in this time (in
our experience, the longest stay) after the inception of the
program would be offset by an increase in the duration of
earlier stays. It is our impression that increased access to
palliative care and improved planning of care have resulted
in a decrease in total inpatient bed use. However, our pa-
tient data systems were not able to test this hypothesis, and
further studies are required to measure the overall utiliza-
tion of acute care beds.
There was a significant discrepancy in the number of can-
cer-related deaths reported by the Alberta Cancer Registry
and the Capital Health Authority for both 1992/93 and
1996/97. According to the latter, the total number of deaths
in acute care hospitals was 955 in 1992/93 and 498 in 1996/97
(Table 2), as compared with 1119 and 633, respectively, re-
ported by the Alberta Cancer Registry (Table 1). This dis-
crepancy is probably due in large part to different definitions
of cause of death. However, data from both sources confirm a
large and significant shift in the number of deaths from acute
care facilities to palliative hospices and home.
The main uncertainty regarding this program was the
level of interest on the part of family physicians and their
willingness to cooperate with the program’s consultants.
We found that 287 (35%) of the family physicians in the
Edmonton region consulted the program regarding their
own patients during 1996/97, and more than 550 have con-
sulted the program since July 1995. Family physician in-
volvement in palliative care is likely higher than reported
here because some physicians may be delivering care to
their patients without consulting the program. These find-
ings suggest that palliative care programs in which primary
care is delivered by palliative care specialists may not be
necessary as long as adequate reimbursement, education,
consultant support and access to beds are available to fam-
ily physicians.
The main disadvantage of programs in which primary
care is delivered by full-time palliative care specialists is
that they do not promote education on palliative care deliv-
ery among family physicians, thereby fostering dependency
and reducing the likelihood that family physicians will ap-
ply this knowledge earlier in the course of illness or to pa-
tients with diseases other than cancer. In addition, these
programs make it necessary for patients and their families
to establish a new relationship with a different treating
physician, and they may delay and decrease the rate of re-
ferrals by primary practitioners or specialists who want to
remain the treating physician.
20
On the other hand, the main limitation of a palliative
care program in which primary care is delivered by fami-
ly physicians is the limited exposure of family physicians
to palliative care patients: during 1996/97, 1279 cancer-
related deaths occurred in the Edmonton region, where
there are 816 registered family physicians. However, our
program deals with this potential problem by providing
physician–nurse consult teams to assist family physicians
throughout the patient’s illness.
For the current analysis, we were unable to compare
data on symptom control in 1996/97 and 1992/93 because
most of the deaths in 1992/93 occurred in acute care facili-
Bruera et al
292 JAMC • 10 AOÛT 1999; 161 (3)
No. of patient-days
Cancer centre†
No. (and %) of deaths 130
Mean length of stay
(and SD), d
15
Total number of patient-days
Variable 1992/93
1 958
(21)
Acute care hospitals*
(10)
22 608
No. (and %) of deaths 825
(16)
(63)
Mean length of stay
(and SD), d
27
95
9
1996/97
875
(10)
(7)
6 085
403
Table 2: Number of cancer-related deaths and length of last hospital
stay before death in 1992/93 and 1996/97
(7)
(32)
15
NA
0.02
< 0.005
p value
NA
< 0.001
< 0.001
Note: SD = standard deviation, NA = not applicable.
*Source: Evaluation, Information and Research, Capital Health Authority, Edmonton.
†Source: Health Records, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton.