DEATH SENTENCES
AND EXECUTIONS
2023
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL REPORT
Index: ACT 50/7952/2024
Original language: English
© Amnesty International 2024
Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed
under a Creative Commons (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives,
international 4.0) licence.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
For more information please visit the permissions page on our website:
www.amnesty.org
Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty
International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence.
First published in 2024 by Amnesty International Ltd
Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street, London WC1X 0DW, UK
amnesty.org
Amnesty International is a movement of 10 million people
which mobilizes the humanity in everyone and campaigns
for change so we can all enjoy our human rights. Our vision
is of a world where those in power keep their promises,
respect international law and are held to account. We are
independent of any government, political ideology, economic
interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership
and individual donations. We believe that acting in solidarity
and compassion with people everywhere can change our
societies for the better.
3
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
CONTENTS
EXECUTING COUNTRIES IN 2023 4
NOTE ON AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL’S FIGURES ON THE USE OF THE DEATH PENALTY 6
THE USE OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN 2023 7
GLOBAL TRENDS 7
EXECUTIONS 9
METHODS OF EXECUTION IN 2023 10
DEATH SENTENCES 11
COMMUTATIONS, PARDONS AND EXONERATIONS 12
THE DEATH PENALTY IN 2023: IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 13
REGIONAL OVERVIEWS 15
AMERICAS 15
ASIA-PACIFIC 21
EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA 28
MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA 29
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 35
ANNEX I: RECORDED EXECUTIONS AND DEATH SENTENCES IN 2023 39
RECORDED EXECUTIONS IN 2023 39
RECORDED DEATH SENTENCES IN 2023 40
ANNEX II: ABOLITIONIST AND RETENTIONIST COUNTRIES AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2023 41
ANNEX III: RATIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2023 43
ANNEX IV: VOTING RESULTS OF HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION 54/35,
ADOPTED ON 13 OCTOBER 2023 45
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
EXECUTING COUNTRIES IN 2023
This map indicates the general locations
of boundaries and jurisdictions and
should not be interpreted as Amnesty
International’s view on disputed territories.
+ indicates that the gure that Amnesty
International has calculated is a minimum.
Where + is not preceded by a number,
this means that Amnesty International
is condent that there was more than one
execution, but it was unable to establish
a credible minimum gure.
4. SOMALIA
Recorded executions
increased by over six
times from 6 in 2022
to 38 in 2023.
9. BANGLADESH
Recorded death
sentences rose by 47%
compared to 2022.
11. SYRIA
The use of the death
penalty continued but
credible minimum
gures remain
unavailable.
7. YEMEN
Known executions
almost quadrupled
from 4 in 2022 to
15 in 2023.
1. CHINA
Continued to execute
and sentence to death
thousands of people
but kept gures secret.
2. IRAN
Recorded executions
increased by 48% compared
to 2022, largely due to spikes
in executions for drug-related
offences.
3. SAUDI ARABIA
Recorded executions
decreased marginally
(12%) in comparison
with 2022.
8. EGYPT
Recorded executions fell by 67%
compared to 2022 but a staggering 590
death sentences were imposed.
6. IRAQ
The mass execution of 13 people
was carried out in the Nasiriyah
Central Prison without prior notice.
5. USA
Executions increased by 33%
compared to 2022, but this
number remained among
historically low gures.
10. NORTH KOREA
The death penalty is likely
to be used at a sustained
rate, but state secrecy
makes it difcult to
independently verify.
12. VIET NAM
Death sentences were
imposed extensively for
drug-related offences.
Of the executing countries in 2023, the
12 countries numbered on the map have
persistently executed people in the past
ve years (2019-2023).
CHINA
IRAN
SAUDI ARABIA
SOMALIA
USA
IRAQ
YEMEN
EGYPT
BANGLADESH
KUWAIT
SINGAPORE
AFGHANISTAN
NORTH KOREA
STATE OF
PALESTINE
SYRIA
VIET NAM
1,000s
172
853+
38+
24
16+
15+
8
5
5
5
+ + + ++
6
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
NOTE ON AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL’S FIGURES
ON THE USE OF THE DEATH PENALTY
This report covers the judicial use of the death penalty for the period January to December 2023.
As in previous years, information is collected from a variety of sources, including: ofcial gures;
judgments; information from individuals sentenced to death and their families and representatives;
media reports; and, as specied, other civil society organizations. Amnesty International reports
only on executions, death sentences and other aspects of the use of the death penalty, such
as commutations and exonerations, where there is reasonable conrmation. In many countries
governments do not publish information on their use of the death penalty. In China and Viet
Nam, data on the use of the death penalty is classied as a state secret. During 2023, little or
no information was available on some countries – in particular Belarus and North Korea – due to
restrictive state practice.
Therefore, for a signicant number of countries, Amnesty International’s gures on the use of the
death penalty are the minimum recorded. The true overall gures are likely to be higher.
In 2009 Amnesty International stopped publishing its estimated gures on the use of the
death penalty in China, a decision that reected concerns about how the Chinese authorities
misrepresented Amnesty International’s numbers. Amnesty International always made clear that
the gures it was able to publish on China were signicantly lower than the reality, because of the
restrictions on access to information. China has yet to publish any gures on the death penalty;
however, available information indicates that each year thousands of people are executed and
sentenced to death. Amnesty International renews its call on the Chinese authorities to publish
information on the use of the death penalty in China.
Where Amnesty International receives and is able to verify new information after publication of this
report, it updates its gures online at amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/death-penalty
In tables and lists, where “+” appears after a gure next to the name of a country – for example,
Malaysia (38+) – it means that Amnesty International conrmed 38 executions, death sentences
or persons under sentence of death in Malaysia but believes that there were more than 38. Where
+” appears after a country name without a gure – for instance, Oman (+) – it means that Amnesty
International has corroborated executions, death sentences or persons under sentence of death
(more than one) in that country but had insufcient information to provide a credible minimum gure.
When calculating global and regional totals, “+” has been counted as two, including for China.
Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the
nature or circumstances of the crime; guilt, innocence or other characteristics of the individual; or the
method used by the state to carry out the execution. The organization campaigns for total abolition of
the death penalty.
7
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
THE USE OF THE DEATH
PENALTY IN 2023
“We cannot arbitrarily ignore the existence of the inherent
right to life of every individual. [...] The death penalty has
not brought the results it was intended to bring”
Ramkarpal Singh, Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department in charge of Law and Institutional Reforms
1
GLOBAL TRENDS
Amnesty International’s monitoring shows that in 2023 the lowest number of countries on record
carried out the highest number of known executions in close to a decade. These gures conrm trends
of recent years that pointed to the ever-increasing isolation of retentionist countries.
The surge in recorded executions was largely attributable to an alarming spike in executions for drug-
related offences in Iran, driven by the complete disregard on the part of the authorities for international
restrictions on the use of the death penalty. Not only may these offences not be punished by death under
international human rights law and standards, but also they disproportionately impacted Iran’s most
marginalised communities, especially men and women from the oppressed Baluchi ethnic minority.
The known totals did not include the thousands of people believed to have been executed in China,
which remained the world’s lead executioner; and North Korea and Viet Nam, countries believed to
continue to carry out executions extensively, but with no available data.
Secrecy and control of information on the death penalty continued to be an indicator of the
determination of governments of some executing countries to use this punishment as a tool to instil fear
and display the power of state institutions. Death penalty gures remained classied as state secrets in
China and Viet Nam. Even though reporting on death sentences and executions was tightly restricted in
these two countries as well as North Korea, the authorities sparingly lifted the veil of secrecy on certain
cases as a reminder that crime, or departures from established rules, would be harshly punished. In
Myanmar, the military authorities continued to impose death sentences in military-controlled courts, in
secretive and grossly unfair proceedings. Similarly, authorities of some US states pursued bills to keep
secret the sourcing of equipment or substances used in executions and prevent scrutiny – exemplary
was the redaction by the authorities of Alabama of signicant parts of the abhorrent new protocol for
executions by nitrogen asphyxiation.
1
Al Jazeera, “Malaysian Parliament moves to end mandatory death penalty, 3 April 2023, aljazeera.com/news/2023/4/3/malaysias-
parliament-votes-to-abolish-the-death-penalty
8
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Pro-death penalty rhetoric took centre stage in some countries, following high-prole crimes or ahead
of elections, despite the lack of evidence that this punishment has a unique deterrent effect. Following a
series of high-prole cases, in September the National Assembly of South Korea adopted amendments
to include the death penalty as maximum punishment for the murder or abandonment of newborns.
The death penalty was also invoked as part of presidential electoral campaigns including in Taiwan and
the USA.
Challenges to the death penalty mounted in several countries over the years appeared to bear
some fruit in 2023. In the month of July, the repeal of the death penalty for drug-related offences
in Pakistan and the abolition of the mandatory death penalty in Malaysia became effective; and
the Parliament of Ghana voted in favour of two bills that would remove the death penalty from the
criminal and military codes.
These developments showed that, when a human rights agenda is put at the centre of government
plans, it is possible to rethink the response to crime and shift the investment of resources from
retribution to prevention of crime and rehabilitation of offenders. The overwhelming majority of countries
in the world have already made this choice and abolished the death penalty in law or practice. At the
end of 2023, bills to repeal this cruel punishment were pending in the parliaments of Kenya, Liberia
and Zimbabwe; that provided renewed hope that it is just a matter of time before the world completely
gets rid of the death penalty.
Recorded global executions
FIGURE 1: RECORDED GLOBAL EXECUTIONS 2014-2023
Yearly totals
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
0
500
1000
1500
2000
9
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
EXECUTIONS
Amnesty International recorded 1,153 executions in 2023, an increase by 31% (270) from the 883
known executions in 2022. It is the highest gure recorded by Amnesty International since the
exceptionally high number of 1,634 in 2015; and the rst time since 2016 (1,032) that the known total
was over 1,000 (see Figure 1).
The known totals do not include the thousands of people believed to have been executed in China,
which in 2023 remained the world’s lead executioner.
2
In addition, Amnesty International could not
determine credible minimum gures for executions carried out in the Democratic People’s Republic
of Korea (North Korea) and Viet Nam, countries believed to continue to punish people by death
extensively. Because of this, the global total presented in this report constitutes a minimum gure that
only partially describes the true extent of states’ resort to executions during the year.
EXECUTIONS RECORDED GLOBALLY IN 2023
Afghanistan (+), Bangladesh (5), China (+), Egypt (8), Iran (853+), Iraq (16+), Kuwait (5),
North Korea (+), Palestine (State of) (+), Saudi Arabia (172), Singapore (5), Somalia (38+),
Syria (+), USA (24), Viet Nam (+), Yemen (15+).
The signicant increase in the known global total was mainly due to a spike in executions in Iran (48%
rise from 576 in 2022; and
more than doubled from 314 in 2021). This was particularly evident in its
known drug-related executions, which surged from 255 in 2022 to 481 in 2023.
Iran alone accounted for 74% of all recorded executions; and Saudi Arabia for 15%. These two
countries were responsible for 89% of the known total.
Rises in known executions were also recorded, most notably, in Somalia (from 6+ in 2022 to 38+ in
2023, a six-fold increase); the USA (from 18 in 2022 to 24 in 2023, 33% rise); and Yemen (from 4+ to
15+, almost quadrupled on the previous year).
Women were known to have been executed in China (+), Iran (24), Saudi Arabia (6), Singapore (1).
Executions were recorded in 16 countries, the lowest number of executing countries on record, since
Amnesty International began monitoring. No executions were recorded in Belarus, Japan, Myanmar and
South Sudan, all countries that carried out executions in 2022 (20 countries in total).
2
In 2009 Amnesty International stopped publishing its estimated gures on the use of the death penalty in China. Instead, the
organization has challenged the authorities to prove their claims that they are achieving their goal of reducing the application of the death
penalty by publishing the gures themselves. Little or partial information was available for several other countries (see Note on Amnesty
International’s gures on the use of the death penalty in this report for further information).
10
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
2023 KNOWN EXECUTING COUNTRIES BY INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
Organization of American States: 1 out of 35 countries carried out executions – USA
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe: 1 out of 57 countries executed
people – USA
African Union: 2 out of 55 countries carried out executions – Egypt and Somalia
League of Arab States: 8 out of 22 countries executed people – Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait,
Palestine (State of), Saudi Arabia, Syria, Somalia and Yemen
Association of Southeast Asian Nations: 2 out of 10 countries carried out executions –
Singapore and Viet Nam
Commonwealth: 2 out of 56 countries executed people – Bangladesh and Singapore
Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie: 2 out of 54 countries carried out
executions – Egypt and Viet Nam
United Nations: 15 out of 193 member states (8% of UN membership) were known to have
executed people – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, North Korea,
Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Somalia, Syria, USA, Viet Nam and Yemen.3
METHODS OF EXECUTIONS IN 2023
4
Beheading Saudi Arabia
Hanging Bangladesh Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Singapore Syria
Lethal injection China USA Viet Nam
Shooting Afghanistan China
North Korea
Palestine
(State of)
Somalia Yemen
3
The State of Palestine has the status of a non-member observer State at the United Nations.
4
In line with previous years, Amnesty International did not receive any reports of judicial executions by stoning in 2023.
11
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
DEATH SENTENCES
Amnesty International recorded 2,428 new death sentences in 2023, a 20% increase on the 2,016
known total of 2022. The 2023 total was the highest total on record since 2018, when 2,531 new
death sentences were known to have been imposed. However, the greater variation in the availability of
information on death sentences for some countries renders year-on-year comparisons of global totals
methodologically challenging.
Amnesty International recorded new death sentences in 52 countries in 2023, the same number as in
2022. Courts in ve countries − Bahrain, Comoros, South Sudan, Sudan and Zambia − were not known
to have sentenced people to death in 2023, while they had done so in 2022. In ve other countries –
Belarus, Cameroon, Japan, Morocco/Western Sahara and Zimbabwe – people were known to have been
sentenced to death in 2023, after a hiatus.
FIGURE 2: RECORDED GLOBAL DEATH SENTENCES 2014-2023
Yearly totals
Recorded global death sentences
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
12
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
DEATH SENTENCES RECORDED GLOBALLY IN 2023
Afghanistan (+), Algeria (38+), Bangladesh (248+), Belarus (1), Botswana
(2), Cameroon (1+), China (+), Democratic Republic of the Congo (33+),
Egypt (590), Ethiopia (3+), Gambia (5), Ghana (10), Guyana (7), India (120).
Indonesia (114+), Iran (+), Iraq (138+), Japan (1), Jordan (3+), Kenya (131),
Kuwait (9+), Laos (4+), Lebanon (11+), Libya (29+), Malaysia (38+), Maldives
(1), Mali (13+), Mauritania (5+), Morocco/Western Sahara (2+), Myanmar
(19+), Niger (8+), Nigeria (246+), North Korea (+), Pakistan (102+), Palestine
(State of, 27+), Qatar (8), Saudi Arabia (3+), Singapore (6+), Somalia (31+),
South Korea (1), Sri Lanka (40+), Syria (+), Taiwan (3), Tanzania (3+), Thailand
(123), Trinidad and Tobago (3), Tunisia (3+), United Arab Emirates (4+), USA
(25), Viet Nam (122+), Yemen (81+), Zimbabwe (3).
Amnesty International recorded signicant rises in the number of death sentences known to have been
imposed in Bangladesh (from 169+ in 2022 to 248+ in 2023), Egypt (from 538 to 590), Iraq (from 41+
to 138+), Kenya (from 79 to 131), Lebanon (from 2+ to 11+), Malaysia (from 16+ to 38+), Nigeria (from
77+ to 246+), Somalia (from 10+ to 31+).
Signicant decreases in the number of death sentences imposed were recorded in the following
countries: Algeria (from 54 in 2022 to 38+ in 2023), Democratic Republic of the Congo (from 76+
to 33+), Gambia (9+ to 5+), India (from 165 to 120), Kuwait (from 16+ to 9+), Myanmar (from 37+ to
19+), Saudi Arabia (from 12+ to 3+), Tanzania (from 11 to 3+), Tunisia (from 26+ to 3+).
Globally, at least 27,687 people were under sentence of death at the end of 2023.
5
COMMUTATIONS, PARDONS AND EXONERATIONS
Amnesty International recorded commutations or pardons of death sentences in 27 countries:
Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Gambia, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Malaysia,
Mali, Morocco/Western Sahara, Myanmar, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Qatar, Somalia, South Korea, South
Sudan, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, United Arab Emirates, USA, Viet Nam, Zambia.
6
Amnesty International recorded 9 exonerations of prisoners under sentence of death in three countries
– Kenya (5), USA (3),
7
Zimbabwe (1).
8
5
For several countries where Amnesty International believed a high number of prisoners were under sentence of death, gures were
not available or it was impossible to estimate a credible number. These included China, Egypt, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Saudi Arabia and
Syria.
6
Commutation is the process by which a death sentence is exchanged for a less severe sentence such as a term of imprisonment, often
by the judiciary on appeal but sometimes also by the executive. A pardon is granted when the convicted individual is completely exempted
from further punishment.
7
Death Penalty Information Center, deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/innocence-database
8
Exoneration is the process whereby, after sentencing and the conclusion of the appeals process, the convicted person is later cleared
from blame or acquitted of the criminal charge, and therefore is regarded as innocent in the eyes of the law.
13
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
THE DEATH PENALTY IN 2023: IN VIOLATION OF
INTERNATIONAL LAW
The death penalty continued to be used in ways that violated international law and
standards in 2023. Some examples included:
At least 8 public executions in Afghanistan (1+) and Iran (7).
At least 5 people – in Iran – were executed for crimes that occurred when
they were below 18 years of age; Amnesty International believed that
other people in this category remained on death row in Iran and Maldives.
9
People with mental or intellectual disabilities were under sentence of
death in several countries, including Japan, Maldives and USA.
Death sentences were known to have been imposed after proceedings
that did not meet international fair trial standards in several countries,
including Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Malaysia,
Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Yemen.
“Confessions that may have been extracted through torture or other
ill-treatment were used to convict and sentence people to death in Egypt,
Iran, Saudi Arabia.
Death sentences were imposed without the defendant being present (in
absentia) in Bangladesh and Tunisia.
Mandatory death sentences were imposed in Afghanistan, Ghana, Iran,
Malaysia, Myanmar, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and
Trinidad and Tobago.
10
Military courts sentenced civilians to death in Myanmar. Special Courts
imposed death sentences in Bangladesh, India, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi
Arabia and Yemen.
9
Often the actual age of the prisoner is in dispute because no clear proof of age exists, such as a certicate of registration at birth.
Governments should apply a full range of appropriate criteria in cases where age is in dispute. Good practice in assessing age includes
drawing on knowledge of physical, psychological and social development. Each of these criteria should be applied in a way that gives
the benet of the doubt in disputed cases so that the individual is treated as a person who was below 18 years of age at the time of the
crime, and accordingly should ensure that the death penalty is not applied. Such an approach is consistent with the principle that the best
interests of the child shall be a primary consideration in all actions concerning children, as required by Article 3(1) of the UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child.
10
The UN Human Rights Committee has stated that “mandatory death sentences that leave domestic courts with no discretion as to
whether to designate the offence as a crime warranting the death penalty, and whether to issue the death sentence in the particular
circumstances of the offender, are arbitrary in nature.” Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 36 on Article 6: Right to Life, UN
Doc. CCPR/C/GC/36 [3 September 2019], para. 37.
14
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
THE DEATH PENALTY IN 2023: IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (CONTINUED)
The death penalty was used for crimes that did not involve intentional
killing and therefore did not meet the threshold of “most serious crimes”
under international law:11
Drug-related offences: Executions for drug-related offences were
recorded in China (+),
12
Iran (481), Kuwait (1), Saudi Arabia (19)
and Singapore (5); the total number of 508 constituted 44% of total
executions recorded globally. Information on Viet Nam, which is very
likely to have carried out such executions, was unavailable.
249 new death sentences were known to have been imposed in 11
countries: Bangladesh (1), China (+),
13
Egypt (6), Indonesia (99 or
86%), Iran (+), Kuwait (3 out of at least 9, 33%), Laos (4 out of at least
4, 100%), Malaysia (20 out of at least 38, 53%), Singapore (6 out of
6, 100%), Sri Lanka (6 out of at least 40, 15%) and Viet Nam (100 out
of at least 122, 82%). In Thailand, of the 325 total number of people
under sentence of death at the end of 2023, 199 including 26 women
had been convicted of drug-related offences.
Economic crimes, such as corruption: China.
Apostasy: Iran
Sexual relationship outside of marriage between consenting adults:
Iran.
Kidnapping: Saudi Arabia
Rape: Bangladesh, Egypt, Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
Different forms of “treason”, “acts against national security”,
“collaboration” with a foreign entity, “espionage”, “questioning the
leaders policies”, participation in “insurrectional movement and
terrorism”, “armed rebellion against the state/ruler” and other
“crimes against the state”, whether or not they led to a loss of life:
Iran and Saudi Arabia.
11
As prescribed by Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human Rights Committee, General Comment No.
36 on Article 6: Right to Life, UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/36 [3 September 2019], para. 35.
12
When calculating global and regional totals, “+” has been counted as two.
13
When calculating global and regional totals, “+” has been counted as two.
15
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
REGIONAL OVERVIEWS
AMERICAS
REGIONAL TRENDS
Yearly totals of death sentences and executions in the USA were the highest since 2019 and 2018,
respectively, but reected historically low trends.
Florida carried out its rst executions and US federal authorities imposed their rst death sentence
since 2019.
For the 15
th
consecutive year, the USA was the only country in the region to execute people.
For the seventh consecutive year, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago and the USA were the only three
countries in the Americas known to have imposed new death sentences.
COUNTRY
2023 RECORDED
EXECUTIONS
2023 RECORDED
DEATH SENTENCES
PEOPLE KNOWN TO BE UNDER SENTENCE
OF DEATH AT THE END OF 2023
Antigua and Barbuda
0 0 0
Bahamas
0 0 0
Barbados
0 0 4
Belize
0 0 0
Brazil (Abolitionist for
ordinary crimes only)
0 0 0
Chile (Abolitionist for
ordinary crimes only)
0 0 0
Cuba
0 0 0
Dominica
0 0 0
El Salvador
(Abolitionist for ordinary
crimes only)
0 0 0
16
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
COUNTRY
2023 RECORDED
EXECUTIONS
2023 RECORDED
DEATH SENTENCES
PEOPLE KNOWN TO BE UNDER SENTENCE
OF DEATH AT THE END OF 2023
Grenada
0 0 1
Guatemala (Abolitionist
for ordinary crimes only)
0 0 0
Guyana
0 7 24
Jamaica
0 0 0
Peru (Abolitionist for
ordinary crimes only)
0 0 0
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 0 0
Saint Lucia
0 0 0
Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines
0 0 1
Trinidad and Tobago
0 3 37
USA
14
24 in 5 states
Alabama (2)
Florida (6)
Missouri (4)
Oklahoma (4)
Texas (8)
25 in 10
jurisdictions
Alabama (4)
Arizona (3)
California (4)
Florida (5)
Louisiana (1)
North Carolina (2)
Ohio (1)
Pennsylvania (1)
Texas (3)
US Federal
government (1)
2,198, including 46 women,
in 28 jurisdictions.
15
Seven states held more than
100 people:
California (651)
Florida (279)
Texas (179)
Alabama (165)
North Carolina (138)
Ohio (122)
Arizona (111)
14
Figures based on Amnesty International’s monitoring of information published by Departments of Corrections, courts and media in
relevant US states.
15
The state of New Hampshire, where the death penalty was abolished in 2019, still held one person under sentence of death.
17
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
A minority of US states pursuing the death penalty continued to defy the 2023 trends for the Americas
region, which otherwise remained largely death penalty-free. Despite increases in the use of this
punishment in the USA, the number of sentences and executions remained in line with the historically
low gures of the more recent decade.
For the second consecutive year, the number of executions in the USA increased, reaching the highest
total recorded since 2018 (25; Figure 3). The 24 executions during 2023 constituted a rise of 33% on
the 2022 total (18); and more than doubled that of 2021 (11), when proceedings were signicantly
affected by restrictions put in place in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Despite the increase,
the 2023 gure remained below 30, as recorded for all but one year of the decade 2014-2023. All
executions recorded in 2023 were carried out by lethal injection, which ended the lives of 23 men and
one transgender woman.
Five US states carried out executions in 2023, one fewer than in the previous year. Florida resumed
executions for the rst time since 2019, accounting for a quarter of all US executions. Its total was
second only to Texas; the combined gures for these two states constituted more than half of the
national total. Arizona and Mississippi, which executed people in 2022, reported a hiatus in 2023.
Noticeably, Missouri’s total number of executions in 2023 (4) doubled that of 2022. Alabama, Missouri
and Texas were the only three states to have executed people every year in the ve-year period 2019-
2023 (See table below).
Ohio executions remained on hold, as Governor, Mike DeWine, continued to issue reprieves because
of ongoing issues with the state method of lethal injection.
16
16
AP News, “Ohio governor postpones 3 more executions scheduled in 2023”, 14 April 2023, apnews.com/article/death-penalty-ohio-
dewine-reprieves-11e26b260754386123cd1fdfa5463bf4
FIGURE 3: EXECUTIONS IN THE USA 1994-2023
Number of yearly US executions
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
0
20
40
60
80
100
18
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
US jurisdictions with
executions in 2019-2023
US jurisdictions with executions in
more than one year in 2019-2023
US states that executed
every year in 2019-2023
Alabama
Arizona
Florida
Georgia
Mississippi
Missouri
Oklahoma
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
US Federal
11
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Missouri
Oklahoma
Tennessee
Texas
US Federal
8
Alabama
Missouri
Texas
3
Amnesty International recorded 25 new death sentences imposed in 10 US jurisdictions. As for
executions, this gure represented an increase on previous years (21 in 2022 and 18 in 2021 and
2020) and was the highest recorded since 2019.
The number of states imposing death sentences (9) was lower by three compared to 2022 (12). Courts
in Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri and Oklahoma did not sentence people to death in in 2023, while they
had done so in the previous year; one death sentence was imposed in Ohio after a two-year hiatus. The
continued pursuit of the death penalty by federal prosecutors resulted in one death sentence being
imposed in August, the rst since 2019.
17
THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE USA
As of the end of 2023, 23 US states had abolished this punishment for all crimes,
including 11 since the beginning of the millennium.
18
Of the 27 remaining states, California,
Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah and Wyoming (14, or 52% of all states that retained the
death penalty in law) had not carried out executions for at least 10 years, with California,
Oregon and Pennsylvania observing governor-ordered moratoriums on executions.
At the federal level, the US military authorities had not carried out any executions since
1961; the Biden administration continued to observe the temporary moratorium on
executions of people convicted under ordinary federal capital laws put in place in July
2021. Under the previous Trump administration, executions resumed with 13 sentences
carried out between July 2020 and January 2021, after a 17-year hiatus.
17
AP News, “Pittsburgh synagogue gunman has been sentenced to die in the nation’s deadliest antisemitic attack, 4 August 2023,
apnews.com/article/pittsburgh-synagogue-shooting-death-penalty-ccb447356b2cfe855875c329fb00f505
18
The states of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Virginia and
Washington. The District of Columbia has also abolished the death penalty.
19
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
During the year, authorities at the federal level and in several states made attempts to secure legislative
amendments to abolish the death penalty or end its use. Bills to repeal this cruel punishment were
introduced in the US Congress and legislative assemblies of states including Arizona, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania and South Carolina.
19
Gavin
Newsom, Governor of California, advanced plans to dismantle the country’s largest death row.
20
John
Bel Edwards, then outgoing Governor of Louisiana, made attempts to commute death sentences before
leaving ofce, but met opposition by the Attorney General and the Pardons Board.
21
At the opposite end, initiatives were launched to change execution protocols or circumvent landmark
judicial decisions in order to facilitate the implementation of executions. Bills to carry out executions by
ring squad were introduced in Idaho and Tennessee, while the state assembly of Montana considered
a bill to expand the substances that can be used in lethal injection protocol.
22
In South Carolina, the
Governor signed into law a bill to conceal the identity of people or entities involved in the preparation
or carrying out of executions.
23
Idaho sought once again to resume executions by scheduling the lethal
injection of a man for the second time in three months, with the execution being stayed by a judge
due to issues with the sourcing of lethal injection substances.
24
Florida governor Ron DeSantis signed
into law a bill that would allow death sentences to be imposed when at least eight jurors vote in favour,
making it the state with the lowest minimum voting required by juries to impose death sentences.
25
In July, Alabama resumed executions by lethal injection after Governor Kay Ivey lifted the short
moratorium she had imposed in November 2022, following two failed execution attempts, in order to
review lethal injection procedures.
26
The Governor later set the rst execution by nitrogen asphyxiation
for January 2024.
27
19
Pressley, “Durbin reintroduce bill to end the federal death penalty”, 13 July 2023, pressley.house.gov/2023/07/13/pressley-durbin-
reintroduce-bill-to-end-the-federal-death-penalty/; Death Penalty Information Center, “2023 Legislation Activity” (accessed on 28 March
2024), deathpenaltyinfo.org/stories/2023-legislation-activity
20
Los Angeles Times, “Newsom’s plan to transform San Quentin prison lacks details but is moving ahead”, 27 July 2023, latimes.com/
california/story/2023-07-27/newsom-san-quentin-prison-transformation-norwegian-model-rehabilitation-california
21
5Kalb, “Agreement reached: Future of death row clemency cases decided in a settlement, 3 October 2023, kalb.com/2023/10/03/
agreement-reached-future-death-row-clemency-cases-decided-settlement/
22
68th Legislature of Montana, Senate Bill No.439, leg.mt.gov/bills/2023/SB0499/SB0439_1.pdf
23
The Clinton Chronicle, “Lethal Injections accomplished with The Shield Statute,” 19 September 2023, myclintonnews.com/stories/
lethal-injections-accomplished-with-the-shield-statute,45011
24
Idaho Capital Sun, “Judge grants stay of execution for Gerald Pizzuto Jr., Idaho man on death row, 10 March 2023, idahocapitalsun.
com/2023/03/10/judge-grants-stay-of-execution-for-gerald-pizzuto-jr-idaho-man-on-death-row/
25
CNN, “DeSantis signs bill eliminating unanimous jury decisions for death sentences”, 20 April 2023, https://edition.cnn.
com/2023/04/20/politics/death-penalty-ron-desantis-orida-parkland-shooting/index.html ; Supreme Court of the United States, Hurst v.
Florida, 136 S.Ct. 616 (2016).
26
AL.com, “Executions back on in Alabama after brief moratorium”, 24 February 2023, al.com/news/anniston-gadsden/2023/02/
executions-back-on-in-alabama-after-brief-moratorium.html
27
NPR, “Alabama sets January execution date using nitrogen gas”, 9 November 2023,
npr.org/2023/11/09/1211717767/alabama-sets-
january-execution-date-using-nitrogen-gas
20
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Violations of international human rights law and standards were documented in several cases of people
executed in 2023, frequently made worse by procedural restrictions limiting admission of new evidence.
Among others, a man was executed in Missouri on 1 August 2023, despite his long-standing diagnosis
of severe mental disabilities. The courts allowed the execution to proceed without a hearing on whether
he had a rational understanding of the reason for his punishment.
28
Florida executed a man on 3
October after the courts dismissed new appeals that his execution would be unconstitutional based
on a new scientic consensus that Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is the functional equivalent of intellectual
disability.
29
Six men continued to face capital prosecution before unfair military commissions at the US naval base
at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
Outside the USA, Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago were the only two countries known to have
sentenced people to death in 2023 (10 in total). Trinidad and Tobago – the only country in the region to
retain the mandatory death penalty for murder – held more than half (55%) of the 67 people known to
be under sentence of death in the region outside the USA.
Nine countries which still retained the death penalty for ordinary crimes, such as murder – Antigua and
Barbuda, Bahamas, Belize, Cuba, Dominica, Guatemala, Jamaica, Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia
– did not hold anyone under sentence of death and did not impose any new death sentences. Grenada
and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines each continued to hold one person formally under sentence
of death, but neither death sentence can be implemented due to judicial standards prohibiting the
implementation of a death sentence after ve years since its imposition.
30
On this ground, the High
Court of Trinidad and Tobago ordered resentencing in the cases of eight men who had been held on
death row for more than ve years.
28
Amnesty International, United States of America: Missouri executes man despite mental disability − Urgent Action (AMR
51/7083/2023), 3 August 2023, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/amr51/7083/2023/en/
29
Amnesty International, USA: Florida carries out sixth execution of 2023 − Urgent Action (AMR 51/7275/2023), 5 October 2023,
amnesty.org/en/documents/amr51/7275/2023/en/
30
In line with the standard set by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Pratt and Morgan v. The Attorney General of Jamaica
(UKPC 37) (1993).
21
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
ASIA-PACIFIC
REGIONAL TRENDS
On the evidence available, Amnesty International believes that China continued to execute and
sentence to death thousands of people, although gures that could clarify the situation remained
classied as a state secret. Similarly, available information pointed to executions being carried out
in high numbers in North Korea and Viet Nam, where secrecy made an accurate determination
impossible.
No executions were recorded in Japan and Myanmar, countries which executed people in 2022.
Drug-related offences continued to be punished by death in several countries.
Malaysia repealed the mandatory death penalty for all offences and reduced the scope of this
punishment; Pakistan abolished the death penalty for drug related offences; and the authorities of Sri
Lanka afrmed their intention not to carry out executions.
COUNTRY
2023 RECORDED
EXECUTIONS
2023 RECORDED
DEATH SENTENCES
PEOPLE KNOWN TO BE UNDER SENTENCE
OF DEATH AT THE END OF 2023
Afghanistan
+ + +
Bangladesh
5 248+ 2,400+
Brunei Darussalam
0 0 +
China
+ + +
India
31
0 120 561
Indonesia
0 114+ 700+
Japan
0 1 115
Laos
0 4+ +
Malaysia
0 38+ 1,275
32
Maldives
0 1 21
Myanmar
0 19+ 100+
31
Project 39A, Death Penalty in India: Annual Statistics Report 2023, January 2023, https://www.project39a.com/annual-statistics-
report-2023; Amnesty International gathered reports relating to 110 new death sentences imposed during 2023.
32
Oral answer to Parliament, Third meeting, Second term of the Fifteenth Parliament, 7 November 2023, Question no.11. This gure
included 906 people who had exhausted their ordinary legal appeals. Ofcial information presented to Parliament in 2024 indicated
that as of 14 February 2024, 1,078 people were under sentence of death, including 437 foreign nationals. Of the total number, 358
(33.2%) had been convicted of murder; 705 (65.4%) of drug trafcking; 7 (0.6%) of waging war against the Ruler; 5 of offences related to
kidnapping; and 3 of rearms-related offences. Parliament of Malaysia, First meeting, Third term of the Fifteenth Parliament, 26 February
to 27 March 2024, written question no.557.
22
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
COUNTRY
2023 RECORDED
EXECUTIONS
2023 RECORDED
DEATH SENTENCES
PEOPLE KNOWN TO BE UNDER SENTENCE
OF DEATH AT THE END OF 2023
North Korea
+ + +
Pakistan
0 102+
3,900+
33
Singapore
5 6+
50+
South Korea
0 1 62
34
Sri Lanka
0 40+ 1,000+
Taiwan
0 3
45
35
Thailand
0 123
36
325
Tonga
0 0 0
Viet Nam
+ 122+ 1200+
Asia-Pacic continued to be the region with the highest number of executions in the world. Based on
its monitoring, Amnesty International believes that the authorities of China continued to carry out more
executions than the rest of the world combined, with thousands of people sentenced to death and
executed during the year. Figures on the use of the death penalty in this country remained classied as
a state secret, but the limited reports available suggested that this cruel punishment continued to be
used for a wide range of offences, including those that do not meet the threshold of the “most serious
crimes” to which the death penalty must be restricted under international law and standards.
An announcement by the Supreme People’s Court of the Peoples Republic of China (SPC) in December
2023 conrmed that its online database, rst established in 2013, had no longer been publishing all
judicial decisions: “Since July 2021, the SPC has modied the website by improving ruling disclosure
standards, resulting in the number of judgments uploaded online dropping to 5.11 million this year from
19.2 million in 2020”; a new platform to access rulings would be accessible only to court staff, with a
library of cases “with reference value” open to the public.
37
33
Amnesty International did not receive a response to its request for information from the authorities of Pakistan and this gure is an
estimate based on available information. Justice Project Pakistan calculated in October 2023 that 6,039 people were on death row.
Justice Project Pakistan, “Death Penalty in Pakistan: Data Mapping Capital Punishment", October 2023, https://jpp.org.pk/wp-content/
uploads/2023/11/JPP_10_10_2023_Death-Penalty-in-Pakistan-Data-Mapping-Capital-Punishment.pdf
34
Including 59 people with their death sentences upheld by the Supreme Court.
35
Including 37 with their death sentences upheld by the Supreme Court.
36
Including one death sentence imposed by the Central Military Court.
37
Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China, “SPC reafrms dedication to improving judicial transparency, China Daily,
28 December 2023, https://subsites.chinadaily.com.cn/supremepeoplescourt/2023-12/28/c_951574.htm#:~:text=Print%20Large%20
Medium%20Small%20.&text=China's%20determination%20and%20efforts%20to,People's%20Court%20(SPC)%20said.
23
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
It is Amnesty International’s assessment that the partial disclosures recorded during the year on ofcial
websites and in state media suggested an intention on the part of the Chinese authorities to use the
death penalty to send a message signaling that neither crime, nor dissent, would be tolerated.
Among other examples, state media in China accompanied several reports of death sentences and
executions with commentary aimed at reminding the population that certain crimes would be harshly
punished. For example, on 23 May media state agency Xinhua reported an ofcial of the SPC as
stating: “[T]he executions reect the commitment of people's courts to resolutely punishing sexual
assault crimes against minors in accordance with the law. They also serve as a reminder for minors
to improve their awareness of self-protection, and for parents, schools and the society to enhance
sex education for minors and the supervision of internet use to protect them from online crimes”.
38
As executions for drug-related offences − in violation of international law and standards − continued,
ofcials of the SPC conrmed at a press conference, marking the UN-backed World Drugs Day on
26 June, that the death penalty had been executed on some “exemplary” cases, “to demonstrate the
People's Court's consistent position on severely punishing drug crimes in accordance with the law”.
39
Death sentences with the possibility of commutation after two years, imposed in high-prole bribery
cases, sometimes involving former state ofcials, gained widespread coverage during the year. The
authorities appeared to show through these that those “abusing power” in the discharge of their duties
and causing “heavy losses to public property and the interests of the state and the people” were
harshly punished.
40
Secrecy in two other countries also signicantly impaired Amnesty International’s assessment of trends
in the region. The organization believed that the authorities of the Democratic People’s Republic
of Korea (North Korea) continued to resort to the death penalty extensively, including to send a
message to deter dissent. However, the lack of transparency and of independent media sources, as
well as restricted access to the country, made it once again impossible for Amnesty International to
verify reports and information it received on the use of the death penalty. Foreign media reported
executions carried out,
including for acts that either did not meet the threshold of the “most serious
crimes” to which the use of the death penalty must be restricted under international law, or which
did not constitute recognizable criminal offences complying with international human rights law.
41
In
January 2023 a new law was enacted to punish, including with the death penalty, those who do not use
exclusively the Pyongyang Korean Language, with no foreign inuences permitted.
42
Amnesty International believed that death sentences continued to be imposed and implemented at a
sustained rate, including after summary trials.
38
Xinhua, “3 men convicted of raping minors executed in China”, 23 May 2023, english.news.cn/20230523/c4991d34c3f749ce88ac56
4526d56098/c.html
39
China Court Network, “The Supreme People's Court held a press conference on the anti-drug work of the People's Court in 2023”, 26
June 2023, chinacourt.org/article/detail/2023/06/id/7367307.shtml
40
Among other examples, Xinhua news, “Former banking regulatory ofcial sentenced to death with reprieve”, 29 December 2023,
english.news.cn/20231229/d93ef89e983b4d23a13e60f02749e3d3/c.html
41
Radio Free Asia, “Publicly executed for killing a woman while trying to steal beans”, 23 December 2023, rfa.org/english/news/korea/
public-execution-12222023162046.html
42
Daily NK, Pyongyang Cultural Language Protection Act, January 2023, dailynk.com/english/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/03/
Pyongyang-Cultural-Language-Protection-Act_English-and-Korean-Versions_Daily-NK.pdf
24
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Figures on the use of the death penalty also remained classied as a state secret in Viet Nam. The
limited information available to Amnesty International relates mostly to death sentences imposed and
upheld, or shared by family members and lawyers. It paints a picture of a country where executions
continued to be carried out at a sustained rate, in almost total secrecy and without public scrutiny.
The impact of such secrecy on the families of those on death row came to light as Lê Văn Mnh was
executed on 22 September 2023, after he had been convicted and sentenced to death in unfair
proceedings, at his third trial, in 2008.
43
His family received a letter from the authorities a few days
earlier, informing them that Lê Văn Mnh’s execution had been conrmed and asking them to meet on
23 September to receive his remains. However, the letter did not indicate the date of the execution,
nor did it give any indication of arrangements for last visits by the family. Cruelly, it was only when his
family members reported to the court for the meeting on 23 September that they were told that Lê Văn
Mnh’s execution had been carried out on the previous day.
44
Amnesty International recorded executions in three other countries in the region. The Taliban de facto
authorities continue to carry judicial executions, including publicly, in Afghanistan.
45
In Bangladesh, ve
people were executed for murder, one more than Amnesty International recorded in 2022. Executions
in Singapore decreased from 11 in 2022 to ve in 2023, all for drug trafcking, and included the
rst woman known to be executed in 20 years.
46
All ve were people who had been sentenced to the
mandatory death penalty, including two who had been found by the judge to have met the “courier”
requirement under the law, but were not entitled to sentencing discretion as the prosecution did not
issue them a certicate of cooperation in disrupting further drug trafcking activities.
47
No executions
were recorded in Japan, where one man was executed in 2022, or in Myanmar, where four men had
been put to death by the military authorities in 2022.
Amnesty International recorded 948 new death sentences imposed in the region, based on available
information. This represented a 10% rise compared to 2022, when at least 861 people were known
to have been sentenced to death. The increase was mostly linked to the higher number of death
sentences that Amnesty International recorded for Bangladesh (at least 248 in 2023, compared to at
least 169 in 2022); Sri Lanka (at least 40 in 2023 compared to at least eight in 2022); and Thailand,
where ofcial gures received by the organization pointed to an increase by 18%, from 104 in 2022 to
123 in 2023.
48
43
Amnesty International, Viet Nam: Halt imminent execution of Le Van Manh and order investigation into allegations of torture (Public
statement, ASA 41/2737/2015), 25 October 2015, amnesty.org/en/documents/asa41/2737/2015/en/
44
Radio Free Asia, “Vietnam executes death row prisoner Le Van Manh”, 23 September 2023, rfa.org/english/news/vietnam/manh-
executed-09232023053849.html
45
By shooting. In May 2023, the Taliban authorities further announced that they would start carrying out executions of women by
stoning. UN Ofce of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Afghanistan: UN experts appalled by Taliban announcement on capital
punishment, 11 May 2023, ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/05/afghanistan-un-experts-appalled-taliban-announcement-capital-
punishment
46
Amnesty International, “Singapore: Unlawful and shameful drug executions continue, including of rst known woman in 20 years”, 28
July 2023, amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/07/singapore-unlawful-and-shameful-drug-executions-continue-including-of-rst-known-
woman-in-20-years/
47
For more information on the requirements needed to avoid the mandatory death penalty in Singapore, see Amnesty International,
Singapore: Cooperate or die: Singapore’s awed reforms to the mandatory death penalty (ACT 50/7158/2017), October 2017, amnesty.org/
en/documents/act50/7158/2017/en/
48
This gure referred to death sentences imposed by courts of rst instance, including one death sentence imposed by a military court.
25
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
A decrease in new death sentences imposed by the sessions court was recorded in India. Figures by
Project 39A indicated that district sessions imposed 120 death sentences in 2023, down from 165 in
2022 (27% decrease). Of these, more than half (64) related to murder involving sexual offences; 42 to
murder; and 10 to terrorism-related offences. Recorded death sentences in 2023 were also signicantly
lower in Myanmar (at least 19 compared to at least 37 the previous year) – 14 of these were imposed
by military-controlled courts in secretive and grossly unfair proceedings, without a right to appeal.
Following the issuing of Martial Law Order 3/2021, the military had transferred authority from civilian
courts to special or existing military tribunals to try cases of civilians in some townships.
In Malaysia, at least 18 new death sentences were known to have been imposed before legislative
amendments abolishing the mandatory death penalty came into force on 4 July, and 20 after.
Remarkably, 14 new death sentences were recorded for drug-related offences before July and six for
the remainder of the year.
The death penalty was extensively used in the region for offences that did not meet the threshold of
the “most serious crimes” to which the use of the death penalty must be restricted under international
law.
49
New drug-related death sentences were known to have been imposed in: Bangladesh (1); Indonesia
(99 or 86% of the recorded death sentences); Laos (4 or 100%); Malaysia (20 or 53%);
50
Singapore
(6 or 100%);
51
Sri Lanka (6 or 15%) and Viet Nam (100 or 82%). Although the breakdown by specic
offences was not shared for death sentences, ofcial information received for the number of people
under sentence of death in Thailand indicated a rise in its total (325) by 67% compared to 2022 (195),
with a signicant 64% increase linked to those on death row convicted of drug-related offences (199,
including 26 women, in 2023, compared to 121, including 14 women, in 2022).
Courts in China punished by death economic crimes, such as corruption, which also do not meet the
threshold of the “most serious crimes” under international law and standards. Amnesty International
recorded ve cases involving former ofcials who were convicted of corruption in China and received
a “suspended” death sentence – with the possibility of commutation after two years – in line with the
apparent increase recorded in recent years.
Sentences related to sexual offences not resulting in death, which also do not meet the threshold of the
most serious crimes”, were recorded in several countries including Bangladesh and Pakistan.
Amnesty International recorded nine new death sentences imposed in Pakistan for “blasphemy”,
an act that does not constitute a recognizable criminal offence complying with requirements under
international human rights law.
People who were below 18 years of age at the time of the offence for which they had been convicted
remained under sentence of death in Maldives.
49
See p. 13 in the global overview for more detailed information.
50
Importantly, no known conrmations of death sentences for drug-related offences by the Federal Court were recorded after full judicial
discretion for the offence of drug trafcking was introduced.
51
All six were mandatory death sentences. In one case, the judge found that the defendant had met the “courier” requirement but the
prosecution did not issue the certicate of substantive assistance.
26
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Amnesty International remained concerned that proceedings did not meet international standards for a
fair trial in several countries in the region. Death sentences were imposed by courts established under
emergency legislation or to try specic offences instead of ordinary courts, including through expedited
proceedings in Bangladesh and Pakistan.
52
In Bangladesh, 21 death sentences were imposed on people convicted and sentenced by the
controversial International Crimes Tribunal, a court established to investigate mass-scale human rights
violations committed during Bangladeshs 1971 War of Independence;
53
and a further 30 by special
courts, such as the Women and Children Repression Prevention Tribunals.
The UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan noted serious concerns
about the fairness of trials preceding death sentences. There are no indications that these individuals
had access to defence lawyers and if their due process rights were upheld during court proceedings” in
Afghanistan.
54
In Japan, the Tokyo High Court ruled on 13 March that then 87-year-old Hakamada Iwao should be
granted a retrial – nine years after the Shizuoka district court rst reached this decision.
55
Hakamada
Iwao was convicted in an unfair trial and sentenced to death in 1968. He spent over 45 years on death
row, predominantly in solitary connement. The retrial began on 27 October 2023.
56
In several countries, legislation was adopted to expand the scope of the death penalty or facilitate its use:
In India, on 20 December the Parliament adopted a new criminal code expanding the number of
offences punishable by death from 12 to 18.
57
On 11 May, the State Administration Council of Myanmar adopted the Arms Act, which makes the
unlawful possession of a weapon belonging to the state punishable by death.
58
On 25 September, the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) adopted legislative
amendments to the Criminal Act to increase the punishment for the murder or abandonment of a
baby to include the death penalty as maximum punishment.
59
52
The UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions stated that military and other special courts “are ill suited
to ensuring full compliance with fair trial standards as required in capital cases” and “should not have the power to impose sentences of
death.” Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, UN Doc. A/67/275, 9 August 2012, para. 33.
53
Amnesty International did not monitor the trials in these cases specically, but it has long raised concern on the set-up of the Court
and the fairness of its proceedings. See for example Amnesty International, “Bangladesh: Two opposition leaders face imminent execution
after serious aws in their trials and appeals”, 27 October 2015, available at amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/10/bangladesh-imminent-
executions/; “Bangladesh: Nizami execution will not deliver justice”, 10 May 2016, amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2016/05/
bangladesh-nizami-execution-will-not-deliver-justice/
54
UN General Assembly, Situation of human rights in Afghanistan − Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in
Afghanistan, Richard Bennett, UN Doc.A/78/338, 1 September 2023, para.33
55
Amnesty International, “Japan: Retrial ruling is step towards justice for world’s ‘longest-serving’ death row prisoner”, 13 March 2023,
amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/03/japan-retrial-ruling-is-step-towards-justice-for-worlds-longest-serving-death-row-prisoner/
56
Asahi Shimbun, “Retrial starts for former death row inmate Hakamada”, 27 October 2023, asahi.com/ajw/articles/15040093
57
Project 39A, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill - A Substantive Analysis, 2023, pg. 18, https://p39ablog.com/2023/08/bharatiya-nyaya-
sanhita-bill-2023-a-substantive-analysis/
58
Burma News International, Military council adopts Arms Act that carries death penalty, 15 May 2023, bnionline.net/en/news/military-
council-adopts-arms-act-carries-death-penalty
59
The National Assembly of the Republic of Korea, “Plenary Results − Plenary passes 51 bills including amendment to the Criminal Act”,
25 September 2023, korea.assembly.go.kr:447/portalEn/bbs/B0000170/view.do?nttId=2583361&menuNo=1500099&sdate=&edate=&s
earchDtGbn=c0&pageUnit=10&pdCndCd=A&pageIndex=1
27
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
The amendments in South Korea followed the announcement on 30 August by Minister of Justice, Han
Dong-hoon, that he had ordered authorities of correctional facilities around the country to carry out
inspections of execution chambers to ensure they were properly maintained;
60
and the approval by the
Cabinet of a bill to remove a clause in the Criminal Act providing that a death sentence could not be
implemented after 30 years since its imposition.
61
Signicant developments towards abolition of the death penalty were also recorded in the Asia-Pacic
region during the year. The repeal of the death penalty for drug-related offences came into effect in
Pakistan in July.
62
On 4 July 2023, the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 (Act 846) came into effect in
Malaysia, repealing the mandatory death penalty and introducing sentencing discretion for all offences
for which it was applicable. Since then, defendants convicted by High Courts of capital offences had
the possibility of being sentenced to death or to the alternative punishment of terms of imprisonment
between 30 and 40 years and whipping;
63
or of having their existing death sentence commuted as part
of their ordinary appeals before the Court of Appeal or Federal Court. A law that came into effect on
12 September 2023 also gave special jurisdiction to the Federal Court to resentence 1,020 individuals
under sentence of death or imprisonment for natural life who had already exhausted their ordinary
judicial proceedings.
64
An initial assessment by Amnesty International during the rst six months since
Malaysian courts were granted sentencing discretion depicted a signicant decrease in the number of
death sentences imposed or upheld.
65
In February, the Attorney General of Sri Lanka informed the Supreme Court that President Ranil
Wickremesinghe had decided not to authorize the implementation of the death penalty.
66
60
Yonhap News, “Justice minister orders proper maintenance of execution facilities”, 30 August 2023, https://en.yna.co.kr/view/
AEN20230830007200315
61
Korea Herald, “Cabinet approves bill to remove sunset clause for death sentence”, 5 June 2023, https://www.koreaherald.com/view.
php?ud=20230605000586
62
Pakistan today, “Pakistan ends capital punishment for drug trafcking convicts”, 26 July 2023, pakistantoday.com.pk/2023/07/26/
pakistan-ends-capital-punishment-for-drug-trafcking-convicts/
63
Under section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code, men above the age of 50 and women are exempted from whipping.
64
According to gures released by Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional
Reform), all 1,020 eligible individuals had applied for resentencing by 17 November 2023. The Star, “1,020 applications to review death
penalty and life imprisonment cases led”, 17 November 2023, thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/11/17/1020-applications-to-review-
death-penalty-and-life-imprisonment-cases-led-says-ramkarpal
65
Amnesty International, “Malaysia: First six months of sentencing discretion underscore urgent need for indenite extension of
moratorium on executions” (ACT 50/7750/2024), 26 February 2024, amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/7750/2024/en/
66
Adaderana.lk, “Supreme Court informed of President’s decision on death penalty, 23 February 2023, adaderana.lk/news.
php?nid=88603
28
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA
REGIONAL TRENDS
Belarus remained the only country in Europe to use the death penalty.
Russia and Tajikistan continued to observe moratoriums on executions.
Armenia ratied and Azerbaijan signed Protocol No. 13 to the European Convention on Human Rights,
concerning the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances.
Country
67
2023 RECORDED
EXECUTIONS
2023 RECORDED
DEATH SENTENCES
PEOPLE KNOWN TO BE UNDER SENTENCE
OF DEATH AT THE END OF 2023
Belarus
0 1 1+
Russia
0 0 0
Tajikistan
0 0 0
In Belarus, one man was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
68
At least one person remained on death
row at the end of 2023.
69
On 9 March, President Alexander Lukashenka signed into law a bill that subjects state
ofcials and military personnel found guilty of committing acts of high treason to the death penalty.
70
This law
violates the restriction under international law to limit the use of the death penalty to “the most serious crimes”,
71
and the requirement not to introduce the death penalty for an offence that was not punishable by death upon
ratication of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
72
to which Belarus is a state party.
73
On 19 October, Armenia completed the process of ratication of Protocol No. 13 to the European Convention
on Human Rights by depositing its ratication instrument.
74
On 8 March, Azerbaijan became the last member of the Council of Europe to sign Protocol No. 13 to the
European Convention on Human Rights, concerning the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances.
This paves the way for Azerbaijan to ratify the Protocol for it to become legally binding in the country.
75
67
Although the law that abolished the death penalty in Kazakhstan became effective in January 2022, Amnesty International indicated in its
report “Death sentences and executions in 2022” (ACT 50/6548/2023) that it could not verify the status of the death sentence imposed on the
last remaining person on death row in the country. However, the authorities of Kazakhstan conrmed to Amnesty International in March 2024 that
the last death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment by the Arkalyk City Court of Kostanay region on 4 February 2022. Thus, Kazakhstan is
removed from the list of monitored countries in this 2023 report.
68
Human Rights Center Viasna, “Death sentence passed in Sluck”, 19 October 2023, https://dp.spring96.org/en/news/113117
69
Amnesty International can conrm that one person was under sentence of death in Belarus at the end of 2023. However, Amnesty International has
not been able to ascertain the status of Viktar Serhel, who was sentenced to death on 25 October 2019. After Viktar Serhel’s appeal was turned down by
the Supreme Court on 31 January 2020, his status has since remained shrouded in secrecy, https://spring96.org/en/news/110810
70
Global Voices, “Ways of punishing dissent in Lukashenka’s Belarus”, 2 May 2023, https://globalvoices.org/2023/05/02/ways-of-punishing-
dissent-in-lukashenkas-belarus/
71
UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment 36 on Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life,
3 September 2019, UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/36, para 35.
72
UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment 36 on Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life, 3
September 2019, UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/36, para 35.
73
UN, “Ratication Status for CCPR - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”, 16 December 1966, https://treaties.un.org/Pages/
ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
74
Council of Europe, “Armenia becomes 45th member state to abolish the death penalty in all circumstances”, 19 October 2023, https://www.
coe.int/en/web/portal/-/armenia-becomes-45th-member-state-to-abolish-the-death-penalty-in-all-circumstances
75
Council of Europe, “Azerbaijan signed Protocol No. 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
concerning the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances”, 8 March 2023, https://www.coe.int/en/web/abolition-death-penalty/-/
azerbaijan-signed-protocol-no.-13-to-the-convention-for-the-protection-of-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms-concerning-the-abolition-of-
the-death-penalty-in-all-circumstances
29
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA
REGIONAL TRENDS
The use of the death penalty increased in the region.
Recorded executions increased by 30% and recorded death sentences increased by 15%.
Known executions rose above 1,000 for the second time in a decade.
Iran carried out 80% of known executions in the region.
COUNTRY
2023 RECORDED
EXECUTIONS
2023 RECORDED
DEATH SENTENCES
PEOPLE KNOWN TO BE UNDER SENTENCE
OF DEATH AT THE END OF 2023
Algeria
0 38 +
Bahrain
0 0 40+
Egypt
8 590 +
Iran
853+ + +
Iraq
16+ 138+ 8,421+
Israel
76
0 0 0
Jordan
0 3+ 222+
Kuwait
5 9+ 30+
Lebanon
0 11+ +
Libya
0 29+ +
Morocco/Western Sahara
0 2+ +
Oman
0 0 +
Palestine (State of)
+ 27+ +
Qatar
0 8 +
Saudi Arabia
172 3+ 31+
Syria
+ + +
Tunisia
0 3+ +
United Arab Emirates
0 4+ 20+
Yemen
15+ 81+ 161+
76
Amnesty International classies Israel as abolitionist for ordinary crimes because its laws provide for the death penalty only for exceptional
crimes such as crimes under military law or crimes committed in exceptional circumstances. The last execution took place in 1962.
30
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Amnesty International recorded an increase in the use of the death penalty in the Middle East and
North Africa region in 2023. Recorded executions in the region increased by 30% from 825 in 2022 to
1,073 in 2023. Recorded death sentences also increased, from 827 in 2022 to 950 in 2023.
Recorded executions and death sentences
FIGURE 4: EXECUTIONS AND DEATH SENTENCES RECORDED
IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA 2014-2023
20232014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
Death sentencesExecutions
Eight countries, the same ones as the previous year, are known to have carried out executions in the
region in 2023 – Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Palestine (State of), Saudi Arabia, Syria and Yemen.
Compared to 2022, recorded executions reduced in the following countries: Egypt (24 to 8); Kuwait (7
to 5) and Saudi Arabia (196 to 172). However, recorded executions increased in the following countries:
Iran (576 to 853); Iraq (11 to 16) and Yemen (4 to 15). The 1,073 executions recorded in the region
in 2023 marked the rst time since 2015 that known executions have risen above 1,000 – the second
time in a decade.
Amnesty International recorded the imposition of death sentences in all countries in the region except
Bahrain, Israel and Oman, a total number of 17 countries (an increase from 16 in 2022). Of the 950
death sentences recorded in 2023, 590 (62%) were imposed in Egypt.
77
Of those recorded in Egypt,
577 were for murder; 6 for drug-related offences; 4for rape; and 3for unknown offences. At least
62 death sentences were imposed on women in Egypt. Amnesty International conrmed that death
sentences were imposed in Iran but the organization was unable to provide a credible minimum gure.
At least 22 commutations and at least 6 pardons were granted in the region.
77
Many of the death sentences were imposed following grossly unfair trials, including by emergency courts, marred by credible reports of
torture and enforced disappearances.
31
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Iran, Saudi Arabia and Iraq were the top three executing countries in the region in 2023. They accounted
for 97% of all recorded executions in the region: Iran (80%), Saudi Arabia (16%) and Iraq (1%).
In Iraq, the authorities carried out the mass execution of 13 people in Nasiriyah Central Prison, without
prior notice, in December.
78
These marked a resumption of mass executions in the country.
79
Of the 16
executions recorded by Amnesty International, none was carried out in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.
In Saudi Arabia, 172 people – six women and 166 men – were executed.
80
They were nationals of the
following countries: Saudi Arabia (134); Bangladesh (8); Yemen (8); India (4); Pakistan (4); Bahrain (2);
Egypt (2); Sudan (2); Ethiopia (1); Ghana (1); Jordan (1); Palestine (State of) (1); Philippines (1); Nepal
(1); Unknown Nationality (1); and USA (1). Of these, 105 were for murder; 25 for terrorism-related
offences; 10 for murder and drug-related offences; six for murder and robbery; four for kidnapping/
abduction and rape; three for murder and terrorism-related offences; three for murder, robbery and
drug-related offences; two for drug-related offences; two for murder attempt, drug-related offences
and driving under the effect of alcohol; two for terrorism-related offences and rape; two for rape; one
for armed robbery, rape and murder attempt; one for armed robbery, shooting and murder attempt;
one for kidnapping and murder; one for high, national and military treason; one for military treason; one
for murder attempt, robbery, and drug-related offences; one for murder and illegal relationship with
minor; and one for terrorism-related and drug-related offences. Of the 172 executions, 68 were for qisas
crimes; 52 for ta’zir crimes; 50 for hadd crimes and the category of two were unknown.
81
In March, the authorities executed Hussein Abo al-Kheir, a Jordanian man, who had been on death
row in Saudi Arabia since 2015 following an unfair trial in which he was convicted of a drug-related
offence.
82
In July, Saudi Arabia’s Specialized Criminal Court sentencedMohammad al-Ghamdi to death
solely for tweets in which he criticized the Saudi authorities.
83
In Iran,
84
the authorities intensied their use of the death penalty to instil fear in the population and
tighten their grip on power in the aftermath of the “Women Life Freedom” uprising of September-
December 2022. The 853 recorded executions were carried out across 30 of Irans 31 provinces:
Alborz (177), Sistan and Baluchestan (67), Kerman (66), Fars (57), Esfahan (49), West Azerbaijan (46),
Lorestan (42), South Khorasan (42), Hormozgān (35), Khorasan-e Razavi (32), Markazi (28), Hamedan
(25), East Azerbaijan (21), Gilan (19), Kurdistan (18), Kermanshah (18), Ardabil (17), Khuzestan (16),
78
“13 Men Suddenly Executed in Iraq as the Country Resumes Mass Executions”, Time, 26 January 2024, https://time.com/6589057/
iraq-mass-executions-capital-punishment/
79
This was the rst mass execution recorded by Amnesty International in Iraq since November 2020 when 21 people were executed.
80
The number of executions for Saudi Arabia is based on the ofcial announcement by the Ministry of Interior through the Saudi Press
Agency, the ofcial news agency of the Saudi Arabia government.
81
In Saudi Arabia, under sharia, there are two categories of crimes: those for which there are xed punishments, hadd and qisas, and
crimes for which there are no xed punishments, tazir. Hadd (plural: hudud) are considered to be offences against God, and they have
divinely ordained and xed punishments. For example, under sharia, the death penalty is prescribed as a punishment for several hadd
crimes, such as adultery, highway robbery when it results in loss of life and apostasy. Qisas are crimes against an individual or family.
Punishments are equivalent to the crime committed (retribution in kind). In cases of murder, relatives of the victim can authorize the
death penalty or pardon the offender and accept nancial compensation, known as “blood money” (diyah). Crimes that have no xed
punishments under sharia are referred to as ta’zir crimes. Their punishments are determined by judges who use their discretion to
determine the sentences; judges are not bound by judicial precedent. For example, judges can use their discretion to sentence to death
individuals accused of adultery, even when the evidentiary standards for classifying the crime as hadd are not met.
82
Amnesty International, “Saudi Arabia: Execution of Jordanian man reveals ‘callous disregard for human life’” (News story, 13 March
2023), https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/03/saudi-arabia-execution-of-jordanian-man-reveals-callous-disregard-for-human-
life/
83
Amnesty International, “Saudi Arabia: Drop ‘ludicrous’ conviction and death sentence against man convicted over social media posts”
(News story, 31 August 2023), https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/08/saudi-arabia-drop-ludicrous-conviction-and-death-
sentence-against-man-convicted-over-social-media-posts/
84
For further information and analysis on the use of the death penalty in Iran in 2023 see: Amnesty International, “Don’t let them kill
us”: Iran’s relentless execution crisis since the 2022 uprising (Index: MDE13/7869/2024), April 2024, https://www.amnesty.org/en/
documents/mde13/7869/2024/en/
32
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Qazvin (12), Zanjan (12), Golestan (11), Qom (11), Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad (7), Ilam (7), Yazd (6),
Mazandaran (5), Tehran (3), Semnan (2), North Khorasan (1) and Bushehr (1).
Among the 853 people executed in Iran were 821 men, 24 women and eight people whose gender was
unknown. Of the executions recorded by Amnesty International, 481 were for drug-related offences;
292 for murder;
85
38 for the overly broad and vaguely worded charges of “enmity against God”
(moharebeh) and/or “corruption on earth” (efsad-e fel-arz) and one for “armed rebellion against the
state” (baghi); 22 for rape; two for “apostasy” and “insulting the Prophet of Islam” (sabbo al-nabi); one
for “adultery”; and 16 for offences unknown to the organization.
The executions disproportionately impacted Irans Baluchi ethnic minority. The authorities executed
at least 172 people – 166 men and six women – from the Baluchi minority, accounting for 20% of all
executions even though they make up around 5% of Irans population. Baluchi people were executed
across the country: 59 in Sistan and Baluchestan province, 31 in Kerman province, 24 in South
Khorasan province, 16 in Khorasan-e Razavi province, 15 in Hormozgān province, eight in Esfahan
province, ve in Fars province, three in Yazd province, two in Alborz province, two in Golestan province,
two in Hamedan province, two in Semnan province, one in Ardabil, one in Mazandaran province, and
one in Qom province.
Of the 853 recorded executions, at least 520 (61%) followed verdicts by Revolutionary Courts, and at
least 317 (37%) followed verdicts by criminal courts. In 16 cases, the specic courts issuing the death
sentences were unknown. In November, the authorities executed Ghasem Abesteh and Ayoub Karimi,
two men from Irans Kurdish Sunni minority, in Ghezel Hesar prison, Karaj, Alborz province. Branch 15
of the Revolutionary Court of Tehran had convicted and sentenced the men to death for “corruption on
earth” (efsad-e fel-arz) and national security offences after a grossly unfair trial.
86
Amnesty International recorded the executions of ve people who were children at the time of the
crime: Adel Damani, Ali Naja, Abdolsamad Shahuzehi, Hamidreza Azari and Mahmoud Rigi.
Hamidreza Azari was still a child (17 years old) at the time of his execution.
The authorities executed seven men in public, including two Afghan nationals who had been
sentenced to death for “enmity against God” (moharebeh) and “corruption on earth” (efsad-e fel arz).
87
In one public execution that took place for rape in May 2023, videos broadcasting the execution on
state media showed children present among the watching public.
88
In December, the authorities executed a young woman – Samira Sabzian Fard – who was sentenced to
death by a court in Tehran under the principle of qisas (“retribution in kind") in relation to the murder of
the man she was forced to marry as a 15-year-old child.
89
85
One of the 292 individuals recorded as having been executed for murder had also been convicted of rape, but to avoid double
counting, Amnesty International included the execution under the category of murder.
86
Amnesty International, “Four Kurdish men at grave risk” (Index: MDE 13/7580/2024), 12 January 2024, https://www.amnesty.org/en/
documents/mde13/7580/2024/en/
87
Mizan Online News Agency, ۲ نفر از عاملان جنایت تروریستی حمله به حرم شاهچراغ (ع) در ملاعام به دار مجازات آویخته شدند [“Two perpetrators of the
terrorist attack against Shahcheragh holy shrine were executed in public”], 8 July 2023, https://www.mizanonline.ir/fa/news/4722173 (in
Persian).
88
Voice of America, اعدام یک مرد در مراغه مقابل چشم کودکان؛ دادستان: شیطان صفت و متجاوز بود [“The execution of a man in Meragheh in front of
children; Prosecutor: he was evil and a rapist”], 25 May 2023, https://ir.voanews.com/a/maraghe-execution-iran-rape/7108897.html (in
Persian).
89
Iran Human Rights, “Samira Sabzian Executed in Ghezelhesar Prison”, 20 December 2023, https://iranhr.net/en/articles/6415/
33
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Of the 853 recorded executions in Iran, at least 545 were unlawfully carried out for acts that should
not result in the death penalty under international law, which prohibits the use of the death penalty for
offences that do not meet the threshold of the “most serious crimes” involving intentional killing.
90
This
includes the 481 executions for drug-related offences which constituted 56% of the total executions
recorded in 2023, an increase of 89% from 255 executions recorded in 2022 and more than tripled
from 132 executions recorded in 2021. The surge reects a lethal shift in Iran’s anti-narcotics policy
since 2021 when Ebrahim Raisi became President and Gholamhossein Eje’i was appointed as Head of
the Judiciary.
Of the 38 people recorded as having been executed for “enmity against God” (moharebeh) and/
or “corruption on earth” (efsad-e fel arz) in 2023, over half were in connection with acts that should
not result in the death penalty (because they did not involve intentional killing), including robbery,
espionage, possession of arms, drawing weapons, and membership in Kurdish opposition groups. In
nine other cases, these vague and broadly worded charges were brought in connection with incidents
involving the death of an ofcial.
Among those executed for “corruption on earth” (efsad-e fel arz) was Hassan Abyat, from Iran’s Ahwazi
Arab ethnic minority.
91
He had been sentenced to death in relation to the death of an agent from the
paramilitary Basij force in 2011 and following an accusation of being a member of an “opposition
group”. Hassan Abyat had denied any involvement in the agent’s death. The authorities executed him in
secret in Sepidar prison, Khuzestan province, on 20 February 2023 without prior notice or nal visit by
his family. A Revolutionary Court used his forced “confessions, believed to have been obtained under
torture, to convict him and sentence him to death.
90
“Most serious crimes” are the only category of crimes for which international law allows the death penalty. International bodies have
interpreted this as being limited to crimes involving intentional killing.
91
Amnesty International, “Iran: Chilling execution spree with escalating use of death penalty against persecuted ethnic minorities”, 2
March 2023, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/03/iran-chilling-execution-spree-with-escalating-use-of-death-penalty-
against-persecuted-ethnic-minorities/
FIGURE 5: BREAKDOWN OF EXECUTIONS BY OFFENCES IN IRAN
481
1
2
292
22
16
1
38
Drug-related offences
Adultery
"Corruption on earth"
& "Enmity against God"
Apostasy
Murder
Rape
Unknown
"Baghi"
34
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
At least one man – Ahmad Nikoui – was executed for “adultery” on 29 April 2023 in Karaj central
prison (Nedamatgah-e Karaj), Alborz province, for having consensual sexual relations with a married
woman. The fate of the woman is unknown. Under Iran’s Islamic Penal Code, the punishment for
engaging in consensual extra-marital sexual relations is punishable by sanctions ranging from a ogging
sentence of 31 lashes to the death penalty, applicable to adults and children including boys over 15
lunar years and girls over 9 lunar years.
The authorities also used the death penalty to punish people who had challenged or were perceived
as having challenged the Islamic Republic establishment and its ideologies. The authorities executed
at least seven people in connection with nationwide protests – six in connection with the “Woman Life
Freedom” protests of September-December 2022 and one in connection with the nationwide protests
of November 2019.
Iran Saudi Arabia Iraq Other executing
countries
FIGURE 6: TOP EXECUTING COUNTRIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST
AND NORTH AFRICA 2023
Executing countries
0
200
400
600
800
1000
35
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
REGIONAL TRENDS
There was a sharp increase in the use of the death penalty in the region; recorded executions
more than tripled and recorded death sentences increased signicantly by 66%.
Somalia was the only country known to have carried out executions.
Death sentences were recorded in 14 countries, a decrease of 2 compared to 2022.
Four countries took positive legislative steps towards the abolition of the death penalty.
COUNTRY
2023 RECORDED
EXECUTIONS
2023 RECORDED
DEATH SENTENCES
PEOPLE KNOWN TO BE UNDER SENTENCE
OF DEATH AT THE END OF 2023
Botswana
0 2 15+
Burkina Faso
0 0 0
Cameroon
0 1+ +
Comoros
0 0 +
Democratic Republic
of the Congo
0 33+ +
Equatorial Guinea
0 0 0
Eritrea
0 0
Eswatini
0 0 1
Ethiopia
0 3+ +
Gambia
0 5 18
Ghana
0 10 180
Kenya
0 131 120
Lesotho
0 0 0
Liberia
0 0 15+
Malawi
0 0 +
Mali
0 13+ +
Mauritania
0 5+ 170+
Niger
0 8+ 8+
Nigeria
0 246+ 3,413+
36
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
COUNTRY
2023 RECORDED
EXECUTIONS
2023 RECORDED
DEATH SENTENCES
PEOPLE KNOWN TO BE UNDER SENTENCE
OF DEATH AT THE END OF 2023
Somalia
38+ 31+ +
South Sudan
0 0 +
Sudan
0 0 +
Tanzania
0 3+ 691
Uganda
0 0 +
Zambia
0 0
Zimbabwe
0 3 59+
In 2023, the sub-Saharan Africa region experienced a setback following progress made against the
death penalty in the previous year. There was a surge in both recorded executions and recorded death
sentences in 2023; and no country abolished the death penalty since 2022.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
20232014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Number of recorded executions and death sentences
FIGURE 7: EXECUTIONS AND DEATH SENTENCES RECORDED
IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 2014-2023
Executions Death sentences
37
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Recorded executions in the region more than tripled from 11 in 2022 to 38 in 2023, although all
of them were recorded in one single country – Somalia – where, compared to 2022, executions
increased signicantly from 6 to 38. Despite a reduction in executing countries – from two in 2022
to one in 2023 – the 38 executions recorded was the highest total recorded in the region since
2015.
Recorded death sentences increased sharply by 66%, from 298 in 2022 to 494 in 2023. Amnesty
International recorded death sentences in 14 countries, two countries fewer than recorded in
the previous year. Compared to 2022, there were increases in recorded death sentences in the
following countries: Cameroon (0 to 1); Ethiopia (2 to 3); Ghana (7 to 10); Kenya (79 to 131); Mali
(8 to 13); Niger (4 to 8); Nigeria (77 to 246); Somalia (10 to 31); and Zimbabwe (0 to 3).
No country in the region abolished the death penalty during the year, although the legislature of
four countries took positive steps towards abolition. In July, the Parliament of Ghana voted in favour
of two bills that removed the death penalty from the Criminal and Other Offences Act 1960 and
the Armed Forces Act 1962. In November, President Nana Akufo-Addo wrote to the Parliament
of Ghana to convey his refusal to assent to the Criminal Offences (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill, 2023
and the Armed Forces (Amendment) Bill, 2023 (“the Bills”). President Akufo-Addo had informed
Parliament that he refused his assent because the Bills were introduced in Parliament as private
member’s bills contrary to Article 108 of the Constitution of Ghana which requires bills of such
scope to be introduced by or on behalf of the President in Parliament.
92
By the end of the year the
Bills had not become law. The last known execution in Ghana was carried out in 1993.
In Kenya, four bills to abolish the death penalty were introduced in Parliament between August
and September. First, the Preservation of Public Security (Amendment) Bill, 2023, introduced
in August, seeks to abolish the death penalty for offences related to the preservation of public
security. Second, the Legal Aid (Amendment) Bill, 2023, introduced in September, seeks to
delete references to the death penalty in the Legal Aid Act (No. 6 of 2016). Third, the Prisons
(Amendment) Bill, 2023, introduced in September, seeks to amend the Prisons Act, CAP 90 Laws
of Kenya, in order to abolish the death penalty and the manner of its execution. Fourth, the Penal
Code (Amendment) Bill, 2023, introduced in September, seeks to amend the Penal Code, Cap
63 Laws of Kenya, in order to abolish the death penalty. The last known execution in Kenya was
carried out in 1987.
In Zimbabwe, a bill to abolish the death penalty in the country was gazetted in December.
93
The
bill seeks to prohibit the imposition of death sentences by the courts; empower the Supreme Court
to replace the death penalty with another appropriate sentence when hearing appeals against
the death penalty; prohibit anyone from carrying out a death sentence that has previously been
imposed; and remove death penalty provisions from existing legislation. The last known execution
in Zimbabwe was carried out in 2005.
In Liberia, a bill to abolish the death penalty in the country was still pending before the House of
Representatives at the end of the year. The bill had been unanimously passed by the Senate in
2022. The last known execution in Liberia was carried out in 2000.
92
The signing of the Bills into law would have been a crucial step towards the abolition of the death penalty in Ghana.
Nevertheless, in addition to the Bills becoming law, as Article 3(3) of the Constitution of Ghana 1992 provides for the death penalty
as punishment for high treason, the removal of that death penalty provision from the Constitution will be required for Ghana to
become abolitionist for all crimes.
93
“Bill to abolish the death penalty gazetted”, The Herald, 15 December 2023, https://www.herald.co.zw/bill-to-abolish-death-
penalty-gazetted/
38
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Across several countries in the region, at least 1,026 commutations and at least 83 pardons were granted
in 2023, and at least 5 exonerations were recorded. Commutations were granted in Gambia (1); Kenya
(606); Niger (8); Nigeria (20); Somalia (1); and Zambia (390). The authorities granted pardons in the
following countries: Gambia (9); Mali (3); Nigeria (35); and South Sudan (36). In Kenya, ve people were
exonerated by the courts having been previously sentenced to death.
Number of Executing Countries
FIGURE 8: NUMBER OF COUNTRIES KNOWN TO HAVE CARRIED OUT
EXECUTIONS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 2014-2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
FIGURE 9: DEATH PENALTY COMMUTATIONS AND
PARDONS GRANTED IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA IN 2023
Zambia
Pardons Commutations
South Sudan
Somalia
Mali
Niger
Nigeria
Kenya
Gambia
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
39
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
ANNEX I: RECORDED
EXECUTIONS AND DEATH
SENTENCES IN 2023
This report only covers the judicial use of the death penalty and does not include gures for
extrajudicial executions. Amnesty International only reports gures for which it can nd reasonable
conrmation, although the true gures for some countries are signicantly higher. Some states
intentionally conceal death penalty proceedings; others do not keep or make available data on the
numbers of death sentences and executions.
Where “+” appears after a gure next to the name of a country – for example, Iraq (16+) – it means
that Amnesty International conrmed 16 executions or death sentences in Iraq but believes there were
more than 16. Where “+” appears after a country name without a gure – for instance, Viet Nam (+) – it
means that Amnesty International has corroborated executions or death sentences (more than one) in
that country but had insufcient information to provide a credible minimum gure. When calculating
global and regional totals, “+” has been counted as two including for China.
RECORDED EXECUTIONS IN 2023
China +
Iran 853+
Saudi Arabia 172
Somalia 38+
USA 24
Iraq 16+
Yemen 15+
Egypt 8
Bangladesh 5
Kuwait 5
Singapore 5
Afghanistan +
North Korea +
Palestine (State of) +
Syria +
Viet Nam +
40
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
RECORDED DEATH SENTENCES IN 2023
China 1,000s
Egypt 590
Bangladesh 248+
Nigeria 246+
Iraq 138+
Kenya 131
Thailand 123
Viet Nam 122+
India 120
Indonesia 114+
Pakistan 102+
Yemen 81+
Sri Lanka 40+
Algeria 38+
Malaysia 38+
Democratic Republic of the
Congo 33+
Somalia 31+
Libya 29+
Palestine (State of) 27+
USA 25
Myanmar 19+
Mali 13+
Lebanon 11+
Ghana 10
Kuwait 9+
Niger 8+
Qatar 8
Guyana 7
Singapore 6+
Mauritania 5+
Gambia 5
Laos 4+
United Arab Emirates 4+
Ethiopia 3+
Jordan 3+
Saudi Arabia 3+
Tanzania 3+
Tunisia 3+
Taiwan 3
Trinidad and Tobago 3
Zimbabwe 3
Morocco 2+
Botswana 2
Cameroon 1+
Belarus 1
Japan 1
Maldives 1
South Korea 1
Afghanistan +
Iran +
North Korea +
Syria +
41
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
ANNEX II: ABOLITIONIST AND
RETENTIONIST COUNTRIES
AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2023
Close to three quarters of the
countries in the world have now
abolished the death penalty in law
or practice. As of 31 December
2023, the numbers were as
follows:
Abolitionist for all crimes: 112
Abolitionist for ordinary crimes only: 9
Abolitionist in practice: 23
Total abolitionist in law or practice: 144
Retentionist: 55
The following are lists of countries in the four categories: abolitionist for all crimes, abolitionist for
ordinary crimes only, abolitionist in practice and retentionist.
1. ABOLITIONIST FOR ALL CRIMES
Countries whose laws do not provide for the death penalty for any crime:
Albania, Andorra, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan,
Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Canada, Chad, Central
African Republic, Colombia, Congo, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon,
Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Kazakhstan, Kiribati, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar,
Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro,
Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niue, North
Macedonia, Norway, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Philippines, Poland, Portugal,
Romania, Rwanda, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra
Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland,
Timor-Leste, Togo, Türkiye, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Uzbekistan,
Vanuatu, Vatican City, Venezuela.
42
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
2. ABOLITIONIST FOR ORDINARY CRIMES ONLY
Countries whose laws provide for the death penalty only for exceptional crimes such as crimes under
military law or crimes committed in exceptional circumstances:
94
Brazil, Burkina Faso, Chile, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Guatemala, Israel, Peru, Zambia.
3. ABOLITIONIST IN PRACTICE
Countries that retain the death penalty for ordinary crimes such as murder but can be considered
abolitionist in practice in that they have not executed anyone during the last 10 years or more and are
believed to have a policy or established practice of not carrying out executions:
Algeria, Brunei Darussalam, Cameroon, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ghana, Grenada, Kenya, Laos, Liberia,
Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco/Western Sahara, Niger, Russia,
95
South Korea, Sri Lanka,
Tajikistan, Tanzania, Tonga, Tunisia.
4. RETENTIONIST
Countries that retain the death penalty for ordinary crimes:
Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize,
Botswana, China, Comoros, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Ethiopia,
Gambia, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya,
Malaysia, Myanmar, Nigeria, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine (State of), Qatar, Saint Kitts and
Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Somalia, South Sudan,
Sudan, Syria, Taiwan, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, United States of
America, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zimbabwe.
94
No executions were recorded in these countries in more than 10 years.
95
Russia introduced a moratorium on executions in August 1996. However, executions were carried out between 1996 and 1999 in the
Chechen Republic.
43
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
ANNEX III: RATIFICATION OF
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES
AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2023
The community of nations has adopted four international treaties providing for the abolition of the death
penalty. One is of worldwide scope; three are regional.
Below are short descriptions of the four treaties, a list of states parties to the treaties and lists of
countries which have signed but not ratied the treaties, as of 31 December 2023. States may become
states parties to international treaties either by acceding to them or by ratifying them. Signature
indicates an intention to become a party at a later date through ratication. States are bound under
international law to respect the provisions of treaties to which they are a party, and to do nothing to
defeat the object and purpose of treaties which they have signed.
SECOND OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT
ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, AIMING AT THE ABOLITION OF THE
DEATH PENALTY
The Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the
abolition of the death penalty, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1989, is of worldwide scope. It
provides for the total abolition of the death penalty but allows states parties to retain the death penalty
in time of war if they make a reservation to that effect at the time of ratifying or acceding to the Protocol.
Any state which is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights can become a party
to the Protocol.
States parties: Albania, Andorra, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium,
Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa
Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador,
Estonia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guinea-Bissau, Honduras,
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malta, Mexico, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Mozambique,
Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, North Macedonia, Norway, Palestine (State
of), Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, San Marino, Sao Tome and
Principe, Serbia, Seychelles, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Timor-Leste,
Togo, Türkiye, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela (total: 90).
44
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
PROTOCOL TO THE AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS TO
ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY
The Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights to Abolish the Death Penalty, adopted by
the General Assembly of the Organization of American States in 1990, provides for the total abolition
of the death penalty but allows states parties to retain the death penalty in wartime if they make a
reservation to that effect at the time of ratifying or acceding to the Protocol. Any state party to the
American Convention on Human Rights can become a party to the Protocol.
States parties: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico,
Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Uruguay, Venezuela (total: 13).
PROTOCOL NO. 6 TO THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS,
CONCERNING THE ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY
96
Protocol No. 6 to the (European) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights), concerning the abolition of the death penalty,
adopted by the Council of Europe in 1983, provides for the abolition of the death penalty in peacetime;
states parties may retain the death penalty for crimes “in time of war or of imminent threat of war”. Any
state party to the European Convention on Human Rights can become a party to the Protocol.
States parties: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova,
Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino,
Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye, Ukraine, United Kingdom (total: 46).
PROTOCOL NO. 13 TO THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS, CONCERNING THE ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY
IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES
Protocol No. 13 to the (European) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights), concerning the abolition of the death penalty in
all circumstances, adopted by the Council of Europe in 2002, provides for the abolition of the death
penalty in all circumstances, including in time of war or of imminent threat of war. Any state party to the
European Convention on Human Rights can become a party to the Protocol.
States parties: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece,
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Monaco,
Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye Ukraine, United Kingdom (total: 45).
Signed but not ratied: Azerbaijan (total: 1).
96
Russia ceased to be a signatory to the treaty on 16 September 2022.
45
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
ANNEX IV: VOTING RESULTS
OF HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
RESOLUTION 54/35
ADOPTED ON 13 OCTOBER 2023
On 13 October 2023, the Human Rights Council (HRC) concluded its 54th session. Resolution A/HRC/
RES/54/35 was adopted as orally revised by a recorded vote during the 49th meeting, as follows:
97
Votes in favour – Argentina, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Chile, Costa Rica, Côte
d’Ivoire, Czechia, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Honduras, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Montenegro, Nepal, Paraguay, Romania, South Africa,
Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Uzbekistan (total: 28).
Votes against – Bangladesh, Cameroon, China, India, Maldives, Pakistan, Qatar, Somalia, Sudan,
United Arab Emirates and United States of America (total: 11).
Abstentions – Algeria, Eritrea, Gambia, Malawi, Morocco, Senegal, and Viet Nam (total: 7).
97
Human Rights Council, Question of the death penalty, UN Doc. A/HRC/54/35, 13 October 2023, https://documents.un.org/symbol-
explorer?s=A/HRC/RES/54/35&i=A/HRC/RES/54/35_6088644
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
IS A GLOBAL MOVEMENT
FOR HUMAN RIGHTS.
WHEN INJUSTICE HAPPENS
TO ONE PERSON, IT
MATTERS TO US ALL.
CONTACT US
info@amnesty.org
+44 (0)20 7413 5500
www.facebook.com/AmnestyGlobal
@Amnesty
JOIN THE CONVERSATION
48
DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS 2023
Amnesty International
Amnesty International’s monitoring of the global use of the death penalty recorded
1,153 known executions in 2023, an increase by 31% from 883 in 2022. However,
there was a signicant decrease in executing countries, from 20 in 2022 to 16 in 2023.
This global spike in known executions was due to a considerable rise in the numbers
recorded in Iran, where executions increased by 48% from 576 in 2022 to 853 in
2023. This constitutes approximately 74% of all known global executions. Notably,
recorded executions in Saudi Arabia decreased by more than 12%, from 196 in 2022
to 172 in 2023.
Compared to 2022, signicant increases in executions were recorded in Iran, Somalia,
Yemen and the USA, while decreases were recorded in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and
Singapore. The use of state secrecy and other restrictive practices in China, North Korea
and Viet Nam, among other states, continued to impair accurate assessments of the use
of the death penalty.
While international human rights law prohibits the use of the death penalty for crimes
that do not meet the threshold of “most serious crimes” (crimes involving intentional
killing), at least ve countries – China, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Singapore –
carried out executions for drug-related offences. A total of 508 such executions was
recorded, marking more than a 56% increase in the number recorded in 2022. In Iran,
drug-related offences represent more than 56% (481 people) of all known executions.
However, the world made some progress towards abolition. In Pakistan and Malaysia,
the death penalty for drug related offences and the mandatory death penalty were
repealed, respectively. In sub-Saharan Africa, the legislatures of four countries –
Ghana, Kenya, Liberia and Zimbabwe – took positive steps towards the abolition of
the death penalty.
Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception.
INDEX: ACT 50/7952/2024
MAY 2024
ENGLISH
amnesty.org
DEATH SENTENCES
AND EXECUTIONS
2023