Introduction
During this lesson students will be introduced to guidelines and procedures for processing custodial
arrests. This includes adhering to the Lively standard, identifying the Gerstein affidavit, and the process of
papering a case. Recruits should take another look at Block 3, report writing, to review the basic steps and
processes of completing a report.
6.3.1 Identify the case statuses used by the Metropolitan Police
Department
As a police officer, you will take many reports. Each report will have a status associated with it. The status
of each case can change and be updated as the investigation progresses.
There are five (5) case statuses, although as patrol officers you will be most concerned with open cases
and those that are closed by arrest. If you believe that you should use one of the other case statuses, you
will need approval from an official. The case statuses are as follows:
Open Cases
A case is considered open when more investigation is required to accumulate additional evidence and/or
to identify the offender or to make an arrest.
Cases Closed by Arrest
A case is considered closed by arrest when a person is arrested, charged with the commission of the
offense, and presented to court for prosecution (whether following arrest, court summons, or police
notice). In addition:
A case may be considered closed by arrest even if no physical arrest is made when the offender is
under eighteen (18) years of age and is cited to appear in juvenile court or before other juvenile
authorities.
Even if more than one person was involved in the commission of the offense, the offense is
considered closed by arrest if one person is arrested and charged.
Several associated crimes may be cleared by the arrest of a single person. When that occurs:
o Each offense specified for a particular case must be closed in the internal narrative (formerly
form PD252).
o Where an offender has been identified and there is corroborating evidence, the case will be
presented to an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) or Assistant Attorney General.
o The offender must be specifically associated with each case closed. General statements based
on such things as similar modus operandi, same offense locations, offender identification,
etc., will not be sufficient in themselves for justifying multiple closures.
o In the event the deciding official (CID sergeant or lieutenant or district official, depending on
the nature of the crime) determines that multiple cases may be closed by the same arrest, he
or she will ensure that the complaint number, the date of the original and supplemental
reports, the district of occurrence, the offense, the value of property recovered and/or the
value of property not recovered, and specific reasons why the AUSA declined to prosecute
are listed for each case closed in the report narrative.