A13
The unpainted iron bridge in Florida would probably be weakened most rapidly by oxidation. An unpainted
bridge would be weakened most rapdily because nothing is keeping the iron and oxygen separated, resulting in
nothing hindering the reaction. A bridge would be weakened faster in Florida than in Alaska because of the
warmer weather. Warmer weather allows the reaction to take place faster because the molecules will be moving
quicker. In Alaska, where it’s cold, the molecules would move slower. Therefore, an unpainted bridge in
Florida would be weakened most rapidly by oxidation.
Anchor Annotation, Paper 13
Score Point 4
There is evidence in this response that the student has a complete and thorough understanding of how to determine
which bridge would probably be weakened most rapidly by oxidation based on the factors influencing reaction
rates. The response is complete and correct with an accurate explanation for why an unpainted bridge would be
weakened most rapidly (because nothing is keeping the iron and oxygen separated, resulting in nothing hindering
the reaction), and why a bridge in Florida would weaken faster than one in Alaska (because of the warmer weather.
Warmer weather allows the reaction to take place faster because the molecules will be moving quicker). The
conclusion, which is provided in the final sentence (Therefore, an unpainted bridge in Florida would be weakened
most rapidly by oxidation), is completely supported by the accurate and coherent information that precedes it.
A14
The unpainted iron bridge in Florida would most rapidly weaken due to oxidation. There are two factors that
would attribute to the oxidation, one being the lack of paint on the bridge. This easily exposes the raw iron to
oxygen, speeding up oxidation. The other factor influencing the reaction is the warm, moist air of Florida. Not
only does the air have the ability to carry oxygen molecules, but the warmth is also a catalyst, which speeds up
the reaction. Comparing this to the cool, dry air in Alaska, the unpainted bridge there would not weaken as fast,
along with the other painted bridges in Florida and Alaska.
Anchor Annotation, Paper 14
Score Point 4
There is evidence in this response that the student has a complete and thorough understanding of how to determine
which bridge would probably be weakened most rapidly by oxidation based on the factors influencing reaction
rates. The response is complete and correct with an accurate assertion that the unpainted bridge in Florida would
weaken most rapidly. The explanation for why an unpainted bridge would weaken most rapidly is correct (lack
of paint on the bridge. This easily exposes the raw iron to oxygen, speeding up oxidation), as is the information
for why a bridge in Florida would weaken faster than one in Alaska (warm, moist air of Florida. Not only does
the air have the ability to carry oxygen molecules, but the warmth is also a catalyst, which speeds up the reaction).
The error of describing the warm air as a “catalyst” is considered irrelevant and does not detract from the overall
accuracy and thoroughness of the response.